Maik Justus wrote:
> I think, the most important thing is a joystick without springs. Maybe
> some friction would help as well. It must not be an expensive one. My
I agree. I cut down the centering spring on my Cyborg-3D and it feels
much nicer now.
Josh
--
Hi,
Heiko Schulz schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Well...h I'm thinking about if this is the
> right way.
>
>
I think, the most important thing is a joystick without springs. Maybe
some friction would help as well. It must not be an expensive one. My
aim is a Flight model, which is as realistic as p
Hi,
Melchior FRANZ schrieb:
> * Maik Justus -- Thursday 10 August 2006 21:51:
> * > Heiko Schulz schrieb:
>
>>> Is the new flightmodel more precise to fly?
>>>
>> Depends on the definition of "precise". It is more real, but it is not
>> easier to fly precise.
>>
>
> Not easier, bu
Hi,
sounds great!
O.k. not harder sounds so good like nothing else!
Greetings
HHS
--- Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> * Maik Justus -- Thursday 10 August 2006 21:51:
> * > Heiko Schulz schrieb:
> > > Is the new flightmodel more precise to fly?
> > Depends on the definition of "
* Maik Justus -- Thursday 10 August 2006 21:51:
* > Heiko Schulz schrieb:
> > Is the new flightmodel more precise to fly?
> Depends on the definition of "precise". It is more real, but it is not
> easier to fly precise.
Not easier, but IMHO not harder either. The first patch releases made
it *a
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well...h I'm thinking about if this is the
> right way.
>
> More realism is good, very good. But too much realism,
> so that you can't fly without very expensive hardware,
> is probably damaging the "Project Flightgear"
>
> It's now really
Hi,
Well...h I'm thinking about if this is the
right way.
More realism is good, very good. But too much realism,
so that you can't fly without very expensive hardware,
is probably damaging the "Project Flightgear"
It's now really hard to fly the Bo 105 and that's
something which new user
Hi,
Heiko Schulz schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> O.k. I understand now slowly...
>
> Is the new flightmodel more precise to fly?
Depends on the definition of "precise". It is more real, but it is not
easier to fly precise. Just a question of training and hardware. Using
pedals and a very good Stick should he
Hi,
O.k. I understand now slowly...
Is the new flightmodel more precise to fly? Still with
some training its too difficult to fly - a precise
landing is a real lucky thing!
Thanx
Greetings
HHS
--- Maik Justus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi Heiko
> Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are yo
Hi Heiko
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you sure?
>
> If I'm flying, the fuselage rotate in the same
> direction like the rotor. I have to push the right
> virtuel pedal in the Bo 105, but in the real world it
> has to be the left.
>
> If I'm not doing anything, the fuslage is turning with
> r
Hi,
Are you sure?
If I'm flying, the fuselage rotate in the same
direction like the rotor. I have to push the right
virtuel pedal in the Bo 105, but in the real world it
has to be the left.
If I'm not doing anything, the fuslage is turning with
rotor - that it shoulden't be!
Greetings
HHS
Hi
* Heiko Schulz -- Thursday 10 August 2006 18:28:
> The rotor on the Bo 105 is rotating anti-clockwise -
> so the fuselage has to rotate clockwise. Right?
Yes. And that's what it does. Just comment out the tail rotor
in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/bo105/bo105.xml and see.
> But why is the Bo 105 rotating
Hi,
I have a question, maybe a very stupid one:
The rotor on the Bo 105 is rotating anti-clockwise -
so the fuselage has to rotate clockwise. Right?
But why is the Bo 105 rotating in the same direction
the rotor is rotating?
A bug? Or is there anything which I didn't understand?
Greetings
HHS
13 matches
Mail list logo
