On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Heiko Schulz wrote: > Hi, > > Well...hmmmm.... I'm thinking about if this is the > right way. > > More realism is good, very good. But too much realism, > so that you can't fly without very expensive hardware, > is probably damaging the "Project Flightgear" > > It's now really hard to fly the Bo 105 and that's > something which new user frighten off.
Hi, You have a point there. Perhaps one could augment the Bo 105 with an optional supporting autopilot/regulator for the tail rotor (regardless of whether the real thing has such a thing or not, and sort of like the auto-coordination option for fixed wing aircraft), so that the pedal input corresponds to requested rate of rotation. However, I have no idea how to add nor how hard it would be to add this and similar features. Cheers, Anders -- "In a world without fences, who needs gates?" --------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Gidenstam Email: anders(at)gidenstam.org WWW: http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGear/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
