On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:43:53 +0100
Richard Andrews wrote:
> This is the same sort of idea I had been toying with. As a newbie to fg I
> felt
> that one tool that would be very handy would be a form of Linux QT
> FG-launcher. It would simply generate the appropriate config file from the
> users
Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
> Have you had a look at fgrun ? It works in exactly the way you've just
> described.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fgrun/
>
No I hadn't seen that - I'll take a look at it this weekend.
> I'm pretty sure that quite a few Linux / UNIX users would like to
> benefit
Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
Have you had a look at fgrun ? It works in exactly the way you've just
described.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fgrun/
Source only so far (except for windows), but maybe it's time to make
some binary packages for other systems as well. I believe the Windows
FlightGear p
On Saturday, 18 December 2004 11:43, Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
> - we could create another app, which would be meant to communicate with
> FlightGear in realtime (probably via the telnet interface), something
> more elaborate than the http interface, in the same way that fgrun does
> for command-l
My package actually does not use a .fgfsrc file. It passes the flags
straight to fgfs.
And I don't understand resource forks either. And have never worked with them.
I couldn't get fgrun to compile on OSX and so have started to write
one that's OS X native using Cocoa and AppleScript. (Applescript
Arthur Wiebe wrote :
I couldn't get fgrun to compile on OSX and so have started to write
one that's OS X native using Cocoa and AppleScript. (Applescript
Studio)
You should try to share your experience / problems with fgrun in order
to get help. I can check your patches if you have some.
-Fred
_
Should I post it here or in the fgrun mailing list? I assume here
since there's only one person subscribed to the fgrun list.
I was getting this error:
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/FlightGear/include -g -O2 -MT
run_posix.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/run_posix.Tpo" \
-c -o run_posix.o `test
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 00:20:44 -0500, Norman wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Curtis L. Olson writes:
> >
> > I am involved with a project where we are going to setup a
> > multi-channel visual system running flightgear. (3 PC's, 3
> > monitors.) We can budget about $150-200 for the graph
As far as I know, there is no fgrun list, so post here.
it looks like your implementation of termios.h is incomplete.
try changing the line :
term.c_oflag &= ~( OLCUC | ONLCR );
by
term.c_oflag &= ~ONLCR;
-Fred
Arthur Wiebe wrote :
Should I post it here or in the fgrun mailing list? I assume here
s
Dave Martin writes:
> On Friday 17 Dec 2004 22:27, David Megginson wrote:
>
> > Totally up to you, but my 172P POH is for the 1981 model
>
> However, I also discovered that the early 172s had more dihedral and a
> slightly different shape to the aerofoil. Comparing this the FG 172P, which
> ha
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:27:09 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've always assumed that it's a fairly late model injected 172, in order to
> justify the current lack of carb heating in the engine model ;-)
The 172P is carbureted, unfortunately.
All the best,
David
--
http://ww
Erik Hofman wrote:
> I think most of the other binary distributions include fgrun. At least
> IRIX and Solaris do.
^^^
Really ? I think I didn't add it to the package because 'fgrun' doesn't
have this priority in my eyes but I can add it the next time,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
David Megginson writes:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:27:09 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've always assumed that it's a fairly late model injected 172, in order to
> > justify the current lack of carb heating in the engine model ;-)
>
> The 172P is carbureted, unfortunately.
>
While you're there, is there any chance of a magneto-related performance loss?
ie: when you run left mags only you get a power loss.
Cheers :)
On Saturday 18 Dec 2004 17:37, David Luff wrote:
> David Megginson writes:
> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:27:09 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:37:35 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah! Carb heating has just moved several places up my TODO list!
I'm not sure that the engine model should even be dealing with carb
heating -- it would be just as easy for something else to tell the
engine the temperatur
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:15:46 +, Dave Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While you're there, is there any chance of a magneto-related performance loss?
>
> ie: when you run left mags only you get a power loss.
It would be nice to see that generalized a bit, so that we can
eventually model fo
I must say that fgrun looks like a lot of bad coding to me. After
doing what you said that file compiled but then I got this error:
Making all in src
make all-am
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/FlightGear/include -g -O2 -MT
fgrun_pty.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/fgrun_pty.Tpo" \
-c -o fgrun_pt
Simulated carb icing might be exciting too (coupled to weather, of
course :-) )
It would certainly make you remember to pull the lever ;)
On Saturday 18 Dec 2004 19:39, David Megginson wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:15:46 +, Dave Martin
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While you're there,
Arthur Wiebe a écrit :
I must say that fgrun looks like a lot of bad coding to me. After
doing what you said that file compiled but then I got this error:
Making all in src
make all-am
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/FlightGear/include -g -O2 -MT
fgrun_pty.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/fgrun_pty.T
Arthur Wiebe wrote :
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/FlightGear/include -g -O2 -MT
fgrun_pty.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/fgrun_pty.Tpo" \
-c -o fgrun_pty.o `test -f 'fgrun_pty.cxx' || echo './'`fgrun_pty.cxx; \
then mv -f ".deps/fgrun_pty.Tpo" ".deps/fgrun_pty.Po"; \
else rm -f ".deps/fgrun_pty.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:20:37 +, Dave Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simulated carb icing might be exciting too (coupled to weather, of
> course :-) )
>
> It would certainly make you remember to pull the lever ;)
Some day, we might model then entire air induction system, the way
that we
OK, I guess I do crazy things when without knowledge. :)
The time_t error went away when including time.h, but login_tty() is
still undefined.
Looking in the login_tty manual page it says you need to include it with:
#include
So I added that include at the top of fgrun_pty.cxx but it still does
I've done most of what I intended with the 172P now except for the
landing/taxi lights on the wing (I'm having to learn a lot to get something
looking good).
I wanted everything to 'just work' so I re-added the alpha-layers to the
textures which were transparent (you could see the panel thru th
23 matches
Mail list logo
