Erik Hofman wrote:
Yes. Maintaining can be done using CVS and when the official release is
out it can be just a matter of letting a script generate the tarballs
for the static scenery.
It may be something which would benefit from a more regular snapshot
though - so that new scenery is available
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:17:48 +0200
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
I've been waiting to post this until after the release went out,
hoping there'd be more discussion when things were a tiny bit calmer .
. .
Over time, various people have done a lot of work on ground
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:17:48 +0200
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that (now that we have a separate Objects directory) it is
possible quite easily to add a command-line option to disable the static
scenery objects.
Fair enough. But with ground structures that
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That
would be easiest for everybody
Chris Metzler wrote:
Fair enough. But with ground structures that are installable separately,
it's possible for a user to pick and choose what to install. For example,
someone could wish to see a set of landmarks in Paris, but not the
buildings at Orly (wanting smoother framerates during
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 10:32:31 +0200
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already explained this to Jon, but I was really aiming at a two
stage approach. Maintaining can be done using CVS. Making it available
for users could be done like downloading the terrain data right now:
Using a
Chris Metzler wrote:
I've been waiting to post this until after the release went out, hoping
there'd be more discussion when things were a tiny bit calmer . . .
Over time, various people have done a lot of work on ground structures,
etc., to add to the scenery for FlightGear. Frederic's did a lot
Chris Metzler wrote:
[...]
So what we discussed was a webpage/site which would (eventually) do for
FlightGear what avsim.com/flightsim.com's file libraries do for MSFS.
At least at first, it'd provide upload/browse/download capability.
Even though I agree with Erik that it would make sense to
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror sites).
That
Erik Hofman wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror
10 matches
Mail list logo
