Re: My Bad (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Post 0.7.9 priorities)

2002-02-14 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Jonathan Polley writes: I tried halving the fog values and got something that looked more realistic, for the long distance visibilities at least. Would it be possible to change the fog equations along with the visibility? This would be for post-0.8.0. You can choose between linear, exp,

Re: My Bad (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Post 0.7.9 priorities)

2002-02-05 Thread Jonathan Polley
I tried halving the fog values and got something that looked more realistic, for the long distance visibilities at least. Would it be possible to change the fog equations along with the visibility? This would be for post-0.8.0. Jonathan Polley On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 09:13 PM,

Re: My Bad (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Post 0.7.9 priorities)

2002-02-04 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Jonathan Polley writes: I am trying to get a handle on what a KC-135 pilot would experience (out sample flights are about 0.5-0.7 mach). What I will probably do, for now, is set the visibility for 50 statute miles, since more than that gives me the next step down in performance. Right

Re: My Bad (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Post 0.7.9 priorities)

2002-02-03 Thread Alex Perry
So, what you are saying is that my having set the visibility to 90 statute miles was not a good thing? ;) Any ideas as to what I should expect for a worst-case visibility? The reason I chose such a large visibility is because the fog effect looked, to me, more like fog and less like