On Sunday 05 October 2008 10:13:54 Durk Talsma wrote:
While I'm at it. :-)
With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
Completeness, variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Durk Talsma wrote:
While I'm at it. :-)
With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
Completeness, variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo
flights
Hi Gerard,
On Sunday 16 November 2008 15:22:50 gerard robin wrote:
could you include the Caudron C684
http://wiki.flightgear.org/images/f/fa/C684-1.png
Great Aircraft, Model, FDM, Cockpit ...
It should be able to pretend.
Cheers
Thanks for pointing out this little gem. I took it up
Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Durk Talsma:
While I'm at it. :-)
With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
Completeness,
variability across categories, realism, suitability
The SU-37 should be regarded as experimental and I did it primarily
to see if I could reproduce some of the aerodynamic properties and
behaviour of the real-life vectored-thrust/canard equipped SU-30
series aircraft in YASim. For the most part, I felt it was
successful but there are some
Durk Talsma wrote:
While I'm at it. :-)
With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
Completeness,
variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo flights (think
of
aerotowing,
Great to hear we gonna have a new release this year!
I would like to have the 747-400 in the list, but if I read these two points:
- disk space (what is the maximum?)
- completeness (when is a plane completed?)
I don't think it would be suitable ;)My top 10, in alphabetical order
Airbus A380
Hi,
Great to hear we gonna have a new release this year!
I would like to have the 747-400 in the list, but if I read
these two points:
- disk space (what is the maximum?)
- completeness (when is a plane completed?)
I don't think it would be suitable ;)My top 10, in
alphabetical order
Hi,
We should definitely add one of the airships.
Oh- yes, indeed! aAnd with this one JSBSim-aircraft which is capable to start
from carrier now!
Ask on IRC, or one of the developers per mail (you find
their
names in the cvs-logs list), or post a link to your
aircraft
here. (IRC
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
We should definitely add one of the airships.
Oh- yes, indeed! aAnd with this one JSBSim-aircraft which is capable to
start from carrier now!
Which won't be possible, because there is missing the Carrier position
calculation ( i asked
* Heiko Schulz -- Sunday 05 October 2008:
I think we don't should change the base package.
We should definitely add one of the airships.
I will try to get most of my projects now into CVS, [...]
Ask on IRC, or one of the developers per mail (you find their
names in the cvs-logs list), or
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
We should definitely add one of the airships.
Oh- yes, indeed! aAnd with this one JSBSim-aircraft which is capable to
start from carrier now!
Which won't be possible, because there
Durk Talsma wrote:
So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
aircraft?
I'd be very happy to see Heiko's overhauled C172 model included in the
release. The outer hull is waaay better than the old one, yet the
inners still need a little bit more touch,
Forgot ne aircraft: the F14 is really nice and has a lot of features! It should
be in the package!
Cheers
HHS
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux
Forgot ne aircraft: the F14 is really nice and has a lot of features! It
should be in the package! Cheers HHS
But as Durk said the planes shouldn't be to heavy sized...
F-14 is almost 25 mb! Wouldn't that be to heavy?
_
Uniek:
Hello,
Durk Talsma wrote:
So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your
current top 10 of
aircraft?
I'd be very happy to see Heiko's overhauled C172
model included in the
release. The outer hull is waaay better than the old one,
yet the
inners still need a little bit more
Hi,
But as Durk said the planes shouldn't be to heavy
sized...
F-14 is almost 25 mb! Wouldn't that be to heavy?
Depends on the other aircrafts we choose! ;-)
We don't should forget, that with the quality also raises the size! And our
aircrafts get better and better!
Looking at MSFS: the
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
We should definitely add one of the airships.
Oh- yes, indeed! aAnd with this one JSBSim-aircraft which is capable to
start
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Martin wrote:
Durk Talsma wrote:
So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your
current top 10 of
aircraft?
I'd be very happy to see Heiko's overhauled C172
model included in the
release. The outer hull is waaay better than the old one,
yet the
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
If you are doing all that work, it might be worth de-coupling the c172p from
all the other c172 Aircraft in CVS (c172, c172r), so it is self-contained and
we only have to include a single directory.
Actually I thought I had done that already quite some time ago?
Martin Spott wrote:
Durk Talsma wrote:
So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
aircraft?
I'd be very happy to see Heiko's overhauled C172 model included in the
release. The outer hull is waaay better than the old one, yet the
inners still need a little bit
On 5 Oct 2008, at 09:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
aircraft?
Before the debate gets too details, there intention was (and still is,
I think) to have at least one aircraft from the following categories:
- the c172
- another
James Turner schrieb:
On 5 Oct 2008, at 09:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
aircraft?
Before the debate gets too details, there intention was (and still is,
I think) to have at least one aircraft from the following
This is sounding like a 'base' and a 'full' or 'extras' release packages.
The base release should contain what is suggested here - a collection
of best of breed aircraft for particular classes that people are
interested in.
The 'full' provides a collection of 'complete' aircraft, but may
James Turner wrote
On 5 Oct 2008, at 09:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
aircraft?
Before the debate gets too details, there intention was (and still is,
I think) to have at least one aircraft from the following
Matthew Tippett wrote:
Likewise with scenery. The default location and whatever demo
locations should ship with reasonably detailed scenery + other common
locations. The 'full' brings in other common scenery, and 'extras'
brings in everything else. (Integrating terragear as a thread within
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Matthew Tippett wrote:
This is sounding like a 'base' and a 'full' or 'extras' release packages.
The base release should contain what is suggested here - a collection
of best of breed aircraft for particular classes that people are
interested in.
The 'full'
Yes. Terrasync.
With the intent being the terrasync thread can point to multiple
repositories for data - low/medium/high resolution. Possibly using a
bittorrent style sharing mechanism to share the bandwidth load :).
Regards... Matthew
On 10/5/08, Ralf Gerlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Tippett wrote:
Yes. Terrasync.
With the intent being the terrasync thread can point to multiple
repositories for data - low/medium/high resolution. Possibly using a
bittorrent style sharing mechanism to share the bandwidth load :).
Bittorrent is ok for downloading huge chunks of
Matthew Tippett wrote
Yes. Terrasync.
With the intent being the terrasync thread can point to multiple
repositories for data - low/medium/high resolution. Possibly using a
bittorrent style sharing mechanism to share the bandwidth load :).
Regards... Matthew
On 10/5/08, Ralf
It was meant more as a concept...
Although with dedicated servers (effectively the same as the current
rsync servers), there should always be a subset of servers providing
all the data. Extra users seeding and sharing at runtime would just
be gravy. Incomplete data would be just as likely as a
I would love to see the Su-37 in the base release. However, it seems like it
still needs some work. What is your opinion?
-Ummon
___
On 5 Oct 2008, at 09:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
aircraft?
Before the
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Terrasync does not work with Windows (it needs Cygwin, which is a bridge
too
far for many of our customers). I would recommend that we do not consider
any scheme which requires terrasync.
As mentioned previously here and other places,
If we're aiming for a release around Christmas then I
could probably get
a set of full 3d instruments done before then. (I can
probably cheat and
steal most of them from the Grob 115 and just update the
instrument face
textures).
Jon
I know- for this my thanks goes to Thorsten
* Christian Schmitt -- Sunday 05 October 2008:
I clearly vote for the Concorde here.
From the Concord developer:
Note that with OSG, many 2D hotspots are missing inside the Concorde
(that works with Plib). Perhaps because of clipping of 2D panels by 3D
flatness.
Though that doesn't really
I'm usually just a lurker on this list but my choices for the most visually and
flyably realistic planes are:
* C172P Skyhawk (3d panel, of course)
* pa28-161 -- Piper Cherokee Warrior II
* Pilatus PC-6 Turbo Porter (with the amazing walk features)
* Boeing 787-8
Hi,
... * EC135
I vote against this! Thanks for that, but I don't think only the appearence of
modeling should count. The main thing of our helis are that they are really
realistic- much more maybe than other sims ( MSFS anyway).
Though of lacking data, the ec135 in opposite to the bo105
Durk Talsma wrote:
While I'm at it. :-)
With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
Completeness,
variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo flights (think
of
aerotowing,
Matthew Tippett wrote:
With the intent being the terrasync thread can point to multiple
repositories for data - low/medium/high resolution. Possibly using a
bittorrent style sharing mechanism to share the bandwidth load :).
We're in negotiations for having a nice - somehow 'sponsored' -
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I would personally like to see a float/seaplane included
Oh yes, to support this idea, I'm going to add Vancouver Coal Harbour
(now: Vancouver Harbour Water Airport) to our airport list ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its
40 matches
Mail list logo
