Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Pro Sim Statement (was Re: FlightGear URL verification patch)

2009-12-14 Thread James Turner
On 14 Dec 2009, at 11:11, Stuart Buchanan wrote: I'd appreciate feedback, even if it is only to agree with the wording of the statement, to ensure that we have buy-in for this. FlightGear is a open-source flight simulator that was started in 2006. It is released under the GNU General

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Pro Sim Statement (was Re: FlightGear URL verification patch)

2009-12-14 Thread Gene Buckle
FlightGear is a open-source flight simulator that was started in 2006. 1996. :) g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Pro Sim Statement (was Re: FlightGear URL verification patch)

2009-12-14 Thread Durk Talsma
On Monday 14 December 2009 12:11:15 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote: I think one statement can easily be used for both purposes if written appropriately. Agreed. That's actually what I was thinking of. I'd appreciate feedback, even if it is only to agree with the wording of the statement, to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Pro Sim Statement (was Re: FlightGear URL verification patch)

2009-12-14 Thread Rob Shearman, Jr.
I think if we are deigning to say Investigation by a number of the FlightGear developers has found no difference between this and the FlightGear v1.9.1 release other than a change of name.; then I also think that after Under the GNU GPL v2 (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html), this is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Pro Sim Statement (was Re: FlightGear URL verification patch)

2009-12-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:24:23 +0100, Durk wrote in message 200912142224.24136.d.tal...@xs4all.nl: On Monday 14 December 2009 12:11:15 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote: I think one statement can easily be used for both purposes if written appropriately. Agreed. That's actually what I was