Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-09 Thread J. Holden
If you want to get 'really' fancy, rwy_prec.cxx and rwy_visual.cxx should also be updated at line 101 with the same fix. Cheers John -- Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-09 Thread J. Holden
It seems to me, on line 97 of rwy_nonprec.cxx, the current line: double length = rwy_info.length / 2.0 + 2.0; should be: // we also check for the displaced threshold, which may make the runway too short (old KVUO bug). double length = ((rwy_info.length - (rwy_info.disp_thresh1 +

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-08 Thread Martin Spott
Ron Jensen wrote: Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track changes to it! The GIT repository you mean ? Ask those who decided do put a compressed file there, _I_ am just continuing an old tradition. Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-08 Thread Vivian Meazza
Martin wrote: Ron Jensen wrote: Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track changes to it! The GIT repository you mean ? Ask those who decided do put a compressed file there, _I_ am just continuing an old tradition. Don't we unzip all the navaids stuff on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-08 Thread Martin Spott
Martin Spott wrote: Ron Jensen wrote: Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track changes to it! The GIT repository you mean ? Ask those who decided do put a compressed file there, _I_ am just continuing an old tradition. BTW, are you still referring to this

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-08 Thread Ron Jensen
On Friday 08 April 2011 13:44:49 Martin Spott wrote: Martin Spott wrote: Ron Jensen wrote: Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track changes to it! The GIT repository you mean ? Ask those who decided do put a compressed file there, _I_ am just continuing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-08 Thread Martin Spott
Ron Jensen wrote: On Friday 08 April 2011 13:44:49 Martin Spott wrote: Please consider my response c) here: http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg28111 .html before blaming me/us on behalf of your private adventure. _I_ still consider FG as sort of a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-07 Thread Martin Spott
Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 20:06:40 -0700 (PDT), J. wrote in message This scenery product is released under the GPLv2. ..thank you both, but _which_ GPLv2, GPLv2-only or GPLv2-and-later? Can we stop this ? GPLv2 is pretty unambiguous: GPLv2 ! Oh my Martin. --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-07 Thread Ron Jensen
Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track changes to it! On Wednesday 06 April 2011 21:06:40 J. Holden wrote: First and foremost, a huge THANK YOU goes out to Martin Spott. Without his help, including giving access to resources I otherwise would not have, I would

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-07 Thread Ron Jensen
On Thursday 07 April 2011 10:52:54 Ron Jensen wrote: The problem is in the definition of KVUO in apt.dat. It is specified as having non-precision markings, but there is not room for those marking. It should have basic marking instead. The runway is 3263 feet minus 762 feet for the overrun so

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pacific Northwest Scenery Available

2011-04-07 Thread J. Holden
Ron: Thanks for the help with the airports, I'll recompile the scenery to fix the problem. I'm still learning my way around TerraGear. Is the problem with KVUO's definition, or rather within the program? While a quick aerial check of KVUO shows the runway does have basic markings, no reason