On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 01:28:56 +0100, Gerard wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 23:27 +0100, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:16:26 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..I still use an old ISA 256kB video card
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 06:49 +0100, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:40:10 +0100, Gerard wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In addition
I should have 256k Video Mem
..you mean 256M. And, word is 128M cards will perform better unless you
go for the very top end
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 15:51 +0100, Gerard ROBIN a écrit :
snip
(II) RADEON(0): Will use back buffer at offset 0x240
(II) RADEON(0): Will use depth buffer at offset 0x300
(II) RADEON(0): Will use 69632 kb for textures at offset 0x3c0
(II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 23:27 +0100, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:16:26 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..I still use an old ISA 256kB video card on my firewall, it can do 256
color VGA!!! ;o)
Not a surprise, if we want to compete
dedicated boxes seem to be the preferred way to go so I've been looking at
graphics cards as a place to start.
A couple of questions;
What's the significance of AGP?
Has anyone had any experience with the GF MX4000 cards?
Dene
I've seen alot of discussion on graphics cards and their suitability for FG.
dedicated boxes seem to be the preferred way to go so I've been looking at
graphics cards as a place to start.
Dunno what you mean by a dedicated box -- I've run FG on a couple of
different machines on which I
is $NZ101.
Dene
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:47:00 +
since i'm aiming at a 0.7-1Ghz
dene maxwell wrote:
I've seen alot of discussion on graphics cards and their suitability
for FG.
dedicated boxes seem to be the preferred way to go so I've been
looking at graphics cards as a place to start.
A couple of questions;
What's the significance of AGP?
Has anyone had any
flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:37:27 -0800
dene maxwell wrote:
I've seen alot of discussion on graphics cards and their suitability for
FG.
dedicated boxes seem to be the preferred way to go so I've been looking
user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:37:27 -0800
dene maxwell wrote:
I've seen alot of discussion on graphics cards and their suitability
for FG.
dedicated boxes seem to be the preferred way to go so
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 14:42 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks for the input...I'll pose this question...on the same platform but
with a 6000 series card what improvement in frame rate would you anticipate?
Dene
Hello,
Only an information
I do have A 6600GT AGP with 128K mem GPU
LOL.
what OS are you running?
Chip set would also be interesting?
Dene
From: syd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
-To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:07:17 +0100
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 14:42 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks for the input
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 15:10 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks Gerard,
Just so I understand;
6600GT AGP video card with 128k vram
FG resolution 1400x1050 (with atlas)
resulting frame rate is 30 to 100 fps
but you'd like 256k main or video memory?
what m/b chipset and OS are you
To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:26:06 +0100
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 15:10 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks Gerard,
Just so I understand;
6600GT AGP video card with 128k vram
FG
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 03:26 +0100, Gerard ROBIN a écrit :
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 15:10 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks Gerard,
Just so I understand;
6600GT AGP video card with 128k vram
FG resolution 1400x1050 (with atlas)
resulting frame rate is 30 to 100 fps
but
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 15:39 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks Gerard,
I will be running win 98se but your input about the improvement from 5000
series to 6000 series is interesting.
What interface was the 5200, AGP,PCI-E or PCI?
Dene
Hello Dene
PCI-E is new and very costly.
flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:40:10 +0100
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 03:26 +0100, Gerard ROBIN a écrit :
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 15:10 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks Gerard,
Just so I understand;
6600GT
-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:51:31 +0100
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 15:39 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks Gerard,
I will be running win 98se but your input about the improvement from
5000
series to 6000 series
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 15:54 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
This gets more interesting all the time!..:-)
500W PSU minimum
nvidia 6000 series video with 256k vram
AGP x8
that's your recommendation?
Dene
Probably a good choice,
more (serie 7000) becomes very expensive.
The
On November 25, 2005 10:06 pm, dene maxwell wrote:
Ok, given i'll be 98se, going with 5000 series agp with as much system ram
as i can afford will give the best performance I can expect?
Have you thought about giving Linux a try?
Ampere
___
Hello,
Only an information
I do have A 6600GT AGP with 128K mem GPU 500 MHZ MEM 900MHZ
Running FG 1400X1050 and Atlas
I get from 30 to 100 fps.
I cannot use full anti aliasing only x2 (more the FPS decrease)
To be comfortable with others applications mem 256K would have been
better.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:40:10 +0100, Gerard wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In addition
I should have 256k Video Mem
..you mean 256M. And, word is 128M cards will perform better unless you
go for the very top end 256M cards, less in-card overhead or somesuch.
..seriously, this wee log
23 matches
Mail list logo
