DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2934
Version: 3.0-feature
response
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2934
Version: 3.0-feature
___
fltk-bugs mailing list
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2934
Version: 3.0-feature
Thanks AlbrechtS: I downloaded fresh source, and configured with
--enable-localpng (even though configure --help indicates that
Author: greg.ercolano
Date: 2013-03-08 12:37:00 -0800 (Fri, 08 Mar 2013)
New Revision: 9834
Log:
Added schemes test to unittests app, to check fltk schemes for artifacts.
Added:
branches/branch-1.3/test/unittest_schemes.cxx
Modified:
branches/branch-1.3/test/Makefile
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2675
Version: 1.4-feature
Note: STR#2672 (patch for gleam) I think conflicts with this
patch, if both are trying to implement gleam.
Both STR's are currently active;
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
Note: STR #2675 may be in conflict; it is suggesting a patch
that is a combo of gleam and grad schemes.
Both STRs are currently active; L
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Active]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
___
fltk-dev mailing list
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Pending]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
// Oh, and I'll do that -- don't worry, not asking you to do it for us ;)
// Just letting you know we might implement it that way.
Anyway,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Pending]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
// A possible solution, hoping you can implement: perhaps when the
// gradient area's height is larger than some amount, the gradient
//
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Pending]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
Attached file unittest-mods.png...
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-featureattachment:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Active]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2675
Version: 1.4-feature
Testing the latest patch -- how do I test it?
I tried building fltk and then running e.g.:
test/buttons -scheme grad1
test/buttons
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Pending]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
Attaching a patch for test/unittests that implements the test/gleam program
code into it. (unittests-schemes.patch)
Also, attached
On 8 Mar 2013, at 17:31, Greg Ercolano wrote:
A request to vote on the addition of the gleam and grad patches to FLTK.
There's two STRs for this:
http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2675
Would like to combine and apply. Code seems OK, looking for consensus
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Pending]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
Attached file fltk-1.3.2-gleam-4.3c.patch...
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-featureIndex: src/fl_gleam.cxx
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Pending]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672
Version: 1.4-feature
Here the fixed patch, the first approach worked like a charm, thanks Greg.
I removed the test program, so to test with: unittests -s gleam
Michael Baeuerle wrote:
I will test on the other systems this evening ...
Tested again on NetBSD, AIX and HP-UX. Still works on all of them.
Great, thanks...
Selex ES Ltd
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14
3EL
A company registered in England
PS. I haven't checked, but maybe this is only a problem with Firefox.
No, I think I have seen that with other browsers too - sure IE does, think
Safari does... So, anyway, not a Firefox feature!
Selex ES Ltd
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14
3EL
A
http://www.cdondalan.com/pxrtdn/nzjflxfzuveltyn/vhhubdrh/pu/xongatpptybb
Dusan Ivanko
3/8/2013 10:44:31 AM
___
fltk mailing list
fltk@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
Looks as if all these invalid messages get triggered by replies to the
Missing scandir() (STR #2687) - now STR #2931 thread.
What makes thin that is, that they always immediately follow a reply
*AND* that the Author field of the invalid message (in the web view)
seems to correspond with the
Hi,
I am using a Fl_Table_Row with SELECT_SINGLE mode (base on table exemple).
I did not succeed to have my callback called when the selection change
on mouse drag (the user keep the mouse down on a selected line and move
over the table to change the active selection).
Looking into
Le 08/03/2013 20:13, David FLEURY a écrit :
Hi,
I am using a Fl_Table_Row with SELECT_SINGLE mode (base on table exemple).
I did not succeed to have my callback called when the selection change
on mouse drag (the user keep the mouse down on a selected line and move
over the table to change the
20 matches
Mail list logo
