Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-12 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
In that doc it could link to the local and/or website docs, eg: FLTK Docs:A HREF=file://path/to/localdocs/html/index.html(local)/A The above would be an autoconfigured path, or optional an expanded environment variable? Good question, I'm not sure.

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 11.01.2011, at 12:06, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: I don't know what to do with fluid, but I think that fluid should probably use an external browser for its docs as well. I'd rather have a short intro to Fluid inside the fluid source files and an explanation where to find the complete docs

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Michael Sweet
On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:14 PM, imacart...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/01/11 20:42, Greg Ercolano wrote: I haven't tried this myself, but can the FLTK html viewer even show our doxygen docs correctly? Short answer: Not it can not. Neither the frames or the non-frames versions of the

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
Michael Sweet wrote: Would it make sense to provide a separate help file for FLUID, and then use that as the test file for the help_viewer demo? That sounds good, as I don't think the FLTK doxygen docs cover fluid anyway. ___ fltk-dev

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Thus, we shouldn't bother to provide a main.html file, but rather add a sample html page for the html viewer test (as Greg volunteered to do already) and add appropriate browser links where needed. Mike might have a point about making separate simple fluid

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
Greg Ercolano wrote: Michael Sweet wrote: Would it make sense to provide a separate help file for FLUID, and then use that as the test file for the help_viewer demo? That sounds good, as I don't think the FLTK doxygen docs cover fluid anyway. ..or I guess I never read them!

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
On 11.01.2011, at 18:15, Greg Ercolano wrote: Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Thus, we shouldn't bother to provide a main.html file, but rather add a sample html page for the html viewer test (as Greg volunteered to do already) and add appropriate browser links where needed. Mike might have

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Duncan Gibson
Mike: Would it make sense to provide a separate help file for FLUID, and then use that as the test file for the help_viewer demo? Greg: That sounds good, as I don't think the FLTK doxygen docs cover fluid anyway. Greg: ..or I guess I never read them! Well bite my tongue,

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
On 11.01.2011 18:48, Greg Ercolano wrote: Greg Ercolano wrote: Michael Sweet wrote: Would it make sense to provide a separate help file for FLUID, and then use that as the test file for the help_viewer demo? That sounds good, as I don't think the FLTK doxygen docs cover fluid

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
Duncan Gibson wrote: Greg: ..or I guess I never read them! Well bite my tongue, apparently there /are/ doxygen fluid docs: http://fltk.org/doc-1.3/fluid.html The problem with this page is that it's too complicated for new users learning fluid. If someone is going to write a fluid

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: In that doc it could link to the local and/or website docs, eg: FLTK Docs:A HREF=file://path/to/localdocs/html/index.html(local)/A The above would be an autoconfigured path, or optional an expanded environment variable? Good

[fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Brian Tilley
Just thought you should know that the file main.html is missing from the RC3 documentation tarball. ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Just thought you should know that the file main.html is missing from the RC3 documentation tarball. Yes - this one is a puzzle to me: - In the fltk-1.1 docs, the entry point was index.html. - in the 1.3-rc2 tarball docs the entry point was main.html. - in the 1.3-rc3 tarball docs the entry

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Just thought you should know that the file main.html is missing from the RC3 documentation tarball. Yes - this one is a puzzle to me: - In the fltk-1.1 docs, the entry point was index.html. - in the 1.3-rc2 tarball docs the entry point was

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Just thought you should know that the file main.html is missing from the RC3 documentation tarball. I'm just wondering, as I assume this is about the help demo bringing up our html docs. I haven't

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread imacart...@gmail.com
On 10/01/11 20:42, Greg Ercolano wrote: I haven't tried this myself, but can the FLTK html viewer even show our doxygen docs correctly? Short answer: Not it can not. Neither the frames or the non-frames versions of the RC2 docs display correctly with the fltk help_viewer demo.

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 10.01.2011, at 22:14, imacart...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/01/11 20:42, Greg Ercolano wrote: I haven't tried this myself, but can the FLTK html viewer even show our doxygen docs correctly? Short answer: Not it can not. Can we make some silly test page then?

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
Matthias Melcher wrote: On 10.01.2011, at 22:14, imacart...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/01/11 20:42, Greg Ercolano wrote: I haven't tried this myself, but can the FLTK html viewer even show our doxygen docs correctly? Short answer: Not it can not. Can we make some silly test page