On 12.11.2012 17:15, Matthias Melcher wrote:
On 09.11.2012, at 19:28, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
Absolutely, well put. But I see that Matt already did the release,
so I'm late with my comment, but anyway, FWIW.
Are the changes correct the way they are?
AFAICT from reading the diffs in
On 09.11.2012, at 19:28, Albrecht Schlosser ajs856s...@go4more.de wrote:
Absolutely, well put. But I see that Matt already did the release,
so I'm late with my comment, but anyway, FWIW.
Are the changes correct the way they are?
___
fltk-dev
On 06.11.2012 01:23, Greg Ercolano wrote:
On 11/05/12 11:05, Matthias Melcher wrote:
[...]
OK, I will have a little bit of time for a release. What needs to be turned
off?
Albrecht brought this up, and want him to check what I write here,
but I think what this is about is a few
On 07.11.2012, at 06:02, Greg Ercolano e...@seriss.com wrote:
Looks like Matt released 1.3.1 -- thank you!
Don't forget to post on fltk.announce as well.
I tried. Either I forgot how, or I don't have access anymore. Tsts.
___
fltk-dev mailing
Done!
On 2012-11-07, at 12:02 AM, Greg Ercolano e...@seriss.com wrote:
Looks like Matt released 1.3.1 -- thank you!
Don't forget to post on fltk.announce as well..
___
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
Matt,
The fltk-announce group/list is read-only; at some point (very soon, I hope)
I will have a chance to get that new VPS setup, at which point I will
reconfigure fltk-announce to either accept posts from specific email addresses
or setup an announce form on the fltk.org web admin pages.
In
I agree that all instances of #if FLTK_ABI_VERSION = 10302
should be changed to #if FLTK_ABI_VERSION = 10301.
About the #define FLTK_ABI_VERSION line of Enumerations.H :
it's presently commented out. It should remain so,
so default compiles don't include ABI-breaking features.
Users who want to
Looks like Matt released 1.3.1 -- thank you!
Don't forget to post on fltk.announce as well..
___
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
On 16.10.2012, at 10:42, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
ian.macart...@selexgalileo.com wrote:
Reawakening this thread.
+1 for 1.3.1 release, with the ABI breaking stuff turned off by default,
and calling it 1.3.1 (not .2)
Yes. I probably voted before (!) but I'm +1 on just
On 11/05/12 11:05, Matthias Melcher wrote:
On 16.10.2012, at 10:42, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
ian.macart...@selexgalileo.com wrote:
Reawakening this thread.
+1 for 1.3.1 release, with the ABI breaking stuff turned off by default,
and calling it 1.3.1 (not .2)
Yes. I
2682HIGHNew ALL Vertical scrollbar of Fl_Text_Editor
have a
strange behavior. Or is bug? 1.3-current Dec 10, 2011Unassigned
Probably survivable for now? It looks like a real bug, but it doesn't seem to
be fatal, more just annoying when it happens...
Reawakening this thread.
+1 for 1.3.1 release, with the ABI breaking stuff turned off by default,
and calling it 1.3.1 (not .2)
Yes. I probably voted before (!) but I'm +1 on just pushing out what we have...
SELEX Galileo Ltd
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road,
+1 for 1.3.1 release, with the ABI breaking stuff turned off by default,
and calling it 1.3.1 (not .2)
___
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
On 10/16/12 03:46, Manolo Gouy wrote:
+1 for 1.3.1 release, with the ABI breaking stuff turned off by default,
and calling it 1.3.1 (not .2)
I'd try to push it out myself if I knew how.
Let's first check what the outstanding bugs are against 1.3.1
that are release
Reawakening this thread.
+1 for 1.3.1 release, with the ABI breaking stuff turned off by default,
and calling it 1.3.1 (not .2)
As Linus says: Release Early, Release Often.
(We've been doing the opposite lately :P )
On 05/30/12 01:22, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
On 29.05.2012 22:46, Matthias
I think I see 5 HIGH and /no/ CRITICALs:
2682HIGHNew ALL Vertical scrollbar of Fl_Text_Editor
have a strange behavior. Or is bug?1.3-current Dec 10, 2011
Unassigned
AlbrechtS In Corvid's example the last (only?) line of text
2845HIGHNew OS image test program blank on cygwin/GDI
1.3-current May 16, 2012Unassigned
a.rburgers.quicknet If I move the GDI image.exe program to a
different computer, the GDI display is normal. The issue occurs on a
virtual windows 7 ...
On 29.05.2012 22:46, Matthias Melcher wrote:
I think that releasing 1.3.1 would now be as good as any other time. Some
very important issues were fixed and we should have done this a long time ago.
Can I please get a count on who is for or against releasing the current FLTK
1.3 SVN as
On 05/30/12 01:22, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
earlier plans were to release 1.3.1 as a bug-fix-only release with only
a few important fixes, w/o the complete RC cycle. That's why we decided
to use the number 10302 (for FLTK 1.3.2) in all ABI breaking additions.
Since we didn't do the
Hi guys,
I think that releasing 1.3.1 would now be as good as any other time. Some very
important issues were fixed and we should have done this a long time ago.
Can I please get a count on who is for or against releasing the current FLTK
1.3 SVN as 1.3.1? Thanks!
- Matthias
On 05/29/12 13:46, Matthias Melcher wrote:
Hi guys,
I think that releasing 1.3.1 would now be as good as any other time. Some
very important issues were fixed and we should have done this a long time ago.
Can I please get a count on who is for or against releasing the current FLTK
1.3
On 29 May 2012, at 21:46, Matthias Melcher wrote:
Hi guys,
I think that releasing 1.3.1 would now be as good as any other time. Some
very important issues were fixed and we should have done this a long time ago.
Can I please get a count on who is for or against releasing the current
On 05/29/12 13:46, Matthias Melcher wrote:
Hi guys,
I think that releasing 1.3.1 would now be as good as any other time. Some
very important issues were fixed and we should have done this a long time ago.
Can I please get a count on who is for or against releasing the current FLTK
1.3
23 matches
Mail list logo
