pdf bean

2002-03-25 Thread Ralph LaChance
Hello, Somewhat off topic, but since this shapes up as the largest collective body of pdf-ers outside of Adobe, I hope not to offend. Anyone know of a pdf-rendering components (java) ? Some time ago (2 years?) Adobe released a beta bean without support. While it is buggy, it one is careful, it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7323] - Content overflow in fo:table-cell if content too long

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7323. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: pdf bean

2002-03-25 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
Hello, Somewhat off topic, but since this shapes up as the largest collective body of pdf-ers outside of Adobe, I hope not to offend. Anyone know of a pdf-rendering components (java) ? see http://www.pdfgo.com/products.html for a $449 payware product that will do this, or try Google --

AW: pdf bean

2002-03-25 Thread Beer, Christian
Hi! I looked quite a bit into the PDF-file format, but that is very difficult. So doing that yourself would not be a easy thing to do. You'll have to implement some of very difficult rendering-things. Christian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ralph LaChance [mailto:[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7449] New: - Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP infinitely

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7449. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7131] - soft hyphen #xAD; not a valid character?!

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7131. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4654] - right align with euro symbol

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4654. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/tools/xslt XSLTransform.java

2002-03-25 Thread chrisg
chrisg 02/03/25 10:08:28 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/apps Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain AWTStarter.java CommandLineStarter.java Driver.java InputHandler.java PrintStarter.java Starter.java src/org/apache/fop/configuration Tag:

JAXP / upgrade to xerces2

2002-03-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi all, I finally have Joerg's JAXP patch committed (well most part of it). FOP should now *run* with any JAXP1.1 compliant parser/transformer. I've succesfully tested it with Saxon 6.5.1 (which includes Aelfred) and JDK1.4 (which includes Crimson/Xalan). Still needs to be done: - build process

FOP vs RenderX

2002-03-25 Thread Mark Bitz
I was wondering if anybody had done any comparisons of FOP vs XEP (RenderX's engine). Or if anybody knows where I can find any such comparisons. RenderX took their comparison down off of their web site and I am trying to fend off a potential XEP solution in my company. I would rather use

error while including svg in fop

2002-03-25 Thread Katiyar, Bhawana
I wish to include an external svg file in xsl:fo document. I have the following lines in my xsl file: fo:instream-foreign-object svg:svg svg:image xlink:href=file:d:\circle.svg image-rendering=optimizeQuality x=0 y=0 width=78mm height=78mm/

Re: error while including svg in fop

2002-03-25 Thread J.Pietschmann
Katiyar, Bhawana wrote: I wish to include an external svg file in xsl:fo document. I have the following lines in my xsl file: fo:instream-foreign-object svg:svg ... java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.xerces.framework.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:1094) at

RE: error while including svg in fop

2002-03-25 Thread Katiyar, Bhawana
yes I declared in the begining in the root. -Original Message- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: error while including svg in fop Katiyar, Bhawana wrote: I wish to include an external svg file in

Re: error while including svg in fop

2002-03-25 Thread J.Pietschmann
Katiyar, Bhawana wrote: yes I declared in the begining in the root. svg:image xlink:href=file:d:\circle.svg Check if the xlink namespace is also declared. If that's ok too, try an absolute path svg:image xlink:href=file:///D:/circle.svg and/or check whether you have the baseDir configured

RE: error while including svg in fop

2002-03-25 Thread Katiyar, Bhawana
The absolute path too doesn't work. I am using Fop ver .18, Is that a problem? Bhawana -Original Message- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: error while including svg in fop Katiyar, Bhawana wrote:

RE: JAXP / upgrade to xerces2

2002-03-25 Thread Arved Sandstrom
No objections, so a +1 from me. While we're at it I think we should take the opportunity to change the fop.jar manifest Class-Path (see earlier posts on this subject), so that none of the required JARs are expected to be in a lib/ directory. fop.jar can get built into the same directory that all

Re: CVS branches

2002-03-25 Thread Michael Gratton
Christian Geisert wrote: I assumend MAIN and HEAD are equivalent ... (Maybe someone can explain this to me ;-) Not in FOP.. 8) If you checkout FOP without a given branch you get the main development branch (aka redesign). Yeah, that's the case. This is usually called the trunk, and is

Re: FOP vs RenderX

2002-03-25 Thread Matt Savino
Search my threads a few months back. In my case XEP was 10 times slower than FOP. The RenderX guys looked at and said there was something weird about my tables. By most accounts RenderX and FOP should be about the same speed. I told them (RenderX) that if they could figure it out and XEP proved

Re: FOP vs RenderX

2002-03-25 Thread Patrick Andries
To be frank, although I have the same experience as Matt as far as speed (or lack thereof) of XEP is concerned, XEP is pleasant to work with (more syntax checking) and does support many more features (among which the absolutely essential keep-with-next for any professional looking document).

Re: AWTRenderer L10N issues

2002-03-25 Thread Alex V. Alishevskikh
Hi, Patrick, You wrote: No, it was coded in 8859-5 (Cyrillic) or Windows 1251, AFAIK, ISO8859-5 is not the same that Windows 1251. I see the extended latin letters (with umlauts etc) instead of cyrillic characters. I've compiled FOP on machine (WinXP, Sun JDK 1.3) with russian locale. ? The