cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/svg SVGElement.java

2002-07-01 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/07/01 03:32:33 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/svg SVGElement.java Log: removed unused import Revision ChangesPath 1.28 +1 -2 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/svg/SVGElement.java Index: SVGElement.java

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/svg PDFGraphics2D.java

2002-07-01 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/07/01 03:33:30 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/svg PDFGraphics2D.java Log: added bounds Revision ChangesPath 1.33 +4 -4 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/svg/PDFGraphics2D.java Index: PDFGraphics2D.java

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/apps InputHandler.java

2002-07-01 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/07/01 03:38:36 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/apps InputHandler.java Log: unused import Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +1 -5 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/apps/InputHandler.java Index: InputHandler.java

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/pdf PDFDocument.java PDFPattern.java PDFXObject.java

2002-07-01 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/07/01 03:39:30 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/pdf PDFDocument.java PDFPattern.java PDFXObject.java Log: fixed some minor errors Revision ChangesPath 1.43 +4 -2 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/pdf/PDFDocument.java Index:

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/image ImageFactory.java ImageLoader.java

2002-07-01 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/07/01 03:40:39 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/image ImageFactory.java ImageLoader.java Log: minor cleanup Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +1 -3 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/image/ImageFactory.java Index: ImageFactory.java

cvs commit: xml-fop build.xml

2002-07-01 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/07/01 04:03:08 Modified:.build.xml Log: added target for pdf transcoder Revision ChangesPath 1.55 +24 -0 xml-fop/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file:

Could not compile

2002-07-01 Thread RamanaJV
Hi everyone, I'm trying to compile the source files through build.bat and it fails saying the following error F:\fop-0.20.3-src\fop-0.20.3\build.xml:590: Cannot use classic compiler, as it is not available A common solution is to set the environment variable JAVA_HOME to your jdk

Re: Could not compile

2002-07-01 Thread Keiron Liddle
You probably have your JAVA_HOME pointing to a jre directory. It needs to be a jdk directory that contains extra jars. On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 13:01, RamanaJV wrote: Hi everyone, I'm trying to compile the source files through build.bat and it fails saying the following error

RE: Could not compile

2002-07-01 Thread RamanaJV
Thanks for the reply Keiron, I have the JAVA_HOME pointing towards the JDK and not the JRE. Just for confirmation, I have installed JDK 1.3 and changed the JAVA_HOME pointing towards the JDK 1.3 directory. Now, I'm able to successfully execute build.bat. It seems like to be a problem with

RE: Could not compile

2002-07-01 Thread joseph . aloysius . gilvary
If you're running on Windows you might have the same problem I had when I first upgraded to JDK 1.4. I even hand edited the registry, explicitly set CLASSPATH and PATH environment variables, and could not get the code to work. I un-installed older JDK versions (1.2.2 1.3.1), then installed

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10374] New: - Syllable-mixing by hyphenation

2002-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10374. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Could not compile

2002-07-01 Thread Torsten Erler
Hi just an idea: The error message suggests that there is a compiler switch [-classic] anywhere in the build process, but AFAIK jdk 1.4 doesn't deliver a classic compiler (JIT) anymore. cu Torsten -Original Message- From: RamanaJV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Montag, 1. Juli

RE: Could not compile

2002-07-01 Thread joseph . aloysius . gilvary
Another thing I just remembered is making sure ant is on the classpath, not just in the extensions directory. Torsten Erler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/2002 09:46 AM Please respond to fop-dev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Could not compile Hi

Links between PDFs

2002-07-01 Thread Gilles Beaugeais
Hello, Is is possible to create links between identified elements in PDFs ? For example, I want to create a link in PDF n°1 to an identified table or figure in PDF n°2. Thanks for help. Gilles Beaugeais. - To unsubscribe,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10374] - Syllable-mixing by hyphenation

2002-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10374. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6042] - Linewraps elide data on lines with intermixed typefaces

2002-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6042. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/svg PDFDocumentGraphics2D.java PDFGraphics2D.java PDFTranscoder.java

2002-07-01 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/07/01 07:42:43 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/pdf PDFDocument.java src/org/apache/fop/render/pdf PDFRenderer.java PDFXMLHandler.java src/org/apache/fop/svg PDFDocumentGraphics2D.java

Re: System.exit stuff

2002-07-01 Thread Christian Geisert
Oleg Tkachenko schrieb: Hello! btw, I've just noticed AWT previewer is broken in cvs maintenance branch. Actually the previewer itself is ok, but it is closed when page I noticed this while testing your patch ;-) is ready to show due to System.exit(0) at the end of Fop.java main

Re: Links between PDFs

2002-07-01 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi, This sort of thing is not currently implemented. From a brief look at the spec it would need to have a goto action pointing to the other pdf and the destination would either point to the appropriate page or a named object in the other file. Using a named object would mean that when the other

Re: System.exit stuff

2002-07-01 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 16:54, Christian Geisert wrote: Simplest solution seems to be to remove System.exit(0) from Fop.java (I'll committ this together with Oleg's patch) You do know that every second person will complain that FOP hangs if you remove this. :/ Christian

Re: System.exit stuff

2002-07-01 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 16:54, Christian Geisert wrote: Simplest solution seems to be to remove System.exit(0) from Fop.java (I'll committ this together with Oleg's patch) You do know that every second person will complain that FOP hangs if you remove this. :/ Mmmh

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10379] New: - Improvement to FOP Classloader

2002-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10379. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: FOP Specialized Classloader: Request for Help (Was:RE: Fop andJDK1.2)

2002-07-01 Thread Rhett Aultman
Done, and I hope I submitted it properly. I think I did. :) I'm happy to have that one set as assigned to me. If anyone else feels like jumping in on this issue, too, that's great. -Original Message- From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 10:55 AM

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo MarginShorthandParser.java

2002-07-01 Thread chrisg
chrisg 2002/07/01 12:11:54 Modified:.Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain CHANGES src/codegen Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain foproperties.xml Added: src/org/apache/fop/fo Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain MarginShorthandParser.java Log: Implemented

Re: System.exit stuff

2002-07-01 Thread J.Pietschmann
Keiron Liddle wrote: You do know that every second person will complain that FOP hangs if you remove this. :/ The exit() Oleg complained about was inserted by me. No problem with removing it, the real exit(0) is in the CommandLineStarter (odd place...). J.Pietschmann

Re: plan for 0.20.4 release

2002-07-01 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki schrieb: Hi Christian here is the plan for the 0.20.4 release [..] There is a bug that needs to be fixed IMHO (or to be documented as known issue): - fo:list-item-label at the end of line http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9864 IMHO this is no showstopper

Re: FOP Specialized Classloader: Request for Help #10379

2002-07-01 Thread Peter B. West
Rhett, The way it seems to work is that the bug remains assigned to fop-dev, and anyone who want to add comments or attachments can go ahead. Consider it assigned to you. Keep the list in touch with what you are doing; think aloud about design issues and ask any specific questions as they