keiron 2002/11/19 00:13:10
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs resources.xml
Log:
1. Adds links to the Eyebrowse mail list archives.
2. Adds help and unsubscribe email addresses for the fop-user fop-dev lists.
3. Rewrote/rearranged some of the verbiage for better
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14637.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 09:18, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
Nikolai Grigoriev discovered new xsl formatter becoming open source ;)
http://www.xmlconference.org/xmlusa/2002/thursday.asp#vp5
Comments? Does anybody plan to participate xml 2002? Some people even
suggest it's Apache where
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14569.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6147.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
keiron 2002/11/19 01:40:03
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs status.xml
Log:
updated data
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +28 -43xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/status.xml
Index: status.xml
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 09:21, Rhett Aultman wrote:
It seems to me that there are (at least) two approaches: 1. A leaf on the
tree says I am here, put me somewhere on a page, or 2. A higher-level node
(page-sequence) says I have some space here, send me something to fill it.
3. 1 + 2.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8635.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12421.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7490.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
keiron 2002/11/19 04:12:29
Modified:.status.xml
Log:
updated for doc and other changes
added Oleg
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +42 -17xml-fop/status.xml
Index: status.xml
===
RCS
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12268.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jeremias2002/11/19 05:33:22
Added: lib Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain xercesImpl-2.2.1.jar
Removed: lib Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain xercesImpl-2.2.0.jar
Log:
Upgrade to Xerces 2.2.1 (bugfix release)
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
jeremias2002/11/19 05:33:54
Modified:contrib/servlet Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain build.sh build.bat
Log:
Adjust classpath
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.5 +1 -1 xml-fop/contrib/servlet/build.sh
jeremias2002/11/19 05:34:08
Modified:docs/examples Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain runtests.sh
runtests.bat
Log:
Adjust classpath
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.8.2.9 +1 -1
jeremias2002/11/19 05:42:55
Modified:.Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain fop.bat build.xml build.sh
build.bat
Log:
Adjust classpath
Reduced the classpath in build.bat/sh to a minimum for easier maintenance.
Revision ChangesPath
No
jeremias2002/11/19 05:57:47
Modified:.Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain CHANGES
Log:
Update changes
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.10.2.28 +9 -6 xml-fop/CHANGES
Index: CHANGES
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14679.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Keiron Liddle wrote:
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 09:21, Rhett Aultman wrote:
It seems to me that there are (at least) two approaches: 1. A leaf on the
tree says I am here, put me somewhere on a page, or 2. A higher-level node
(page-sequence) says I have some space here, send me something to fill it.
Keiron Liddle wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 09:18, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
Nikolai Grigoriev discovered new xsl formatter becoming open source ;)
http://www.xmlconference.org/xmlusa/2002/thursday.asp#vp5
Comments? Does anybody plan to participate xml 2002? Some people even
suggest
Jeremias,
I'm glad to see that you have upgraded Xerces to 2.2.1. I just
discovered that 2.2.0 was badly broken when my code fell over after I
had upgraded to that release. Unfortunately I had also made a number of
code changes at the same time (bad practice), so it took a while to work
out
Keiron Liddle wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 09:18, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
Nikolai Grigoriev discovered new xsl formatter becoming open source ;)
http://www.xmlconference.org/xmlusa/2002/thursday.asp#vp5
Comments? Does anybody plan to participate xml 2002? Some people even
suggest
Hi Peter
I should have done that earlier because about at the same time I updated
to Xerces 2.2.0, Xerces 2.2.1 was published and I knew it was a bugfix
release.
On 19.11.2002 15:18:45 Peter B. West wrote:
I'm glad to see that you have upgraded Xerces to 2.2.1. I just
discovered that 2.2.0
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 15:07, Peter B. West wrote:
If possible I think we should try to avoid making multiple passes since
it can lead to loops etc. The table layout auto will need at least two
passes but this should be possible using the layout managers.
Is that a should be or an is?
As I mentioned in another forum, I have a fairly comprehensive set of
samples, both contrived and realistic, that are available to any
implemmentors. I'd be happy to provide these to the FOP team--just let
me know who to send them to or where to upload them. These have been
developed both as
Keiron Liddle wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 15:07, Peter B. West wrote:
If possible I think we should try to avoid making multiple passes since
it can lead to loops etc. The table layout auto will need at least two
passes but this should be possible using the layout managers.
Is that a should
Respone below.
-Original Message-
From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 5:06 AM
To: FOP
Subject: RE: Getting breaks: revisited
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 09:21, Rhett Aultman wrote:
What if, instead, two passes were taken? The first pass would be
Response below.
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Getting breaks: revisited
Keiron Liddle wrote:
I could just do it, special cases can use special techniques provided it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3430.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14657.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11709.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
I tried to include some svg graphics with
fo:external-graphic src=circle.svg/
If I use Mayura Draw for drawing, there are no problems, but if I
make a simple drawing with staroffice 6.0 and export it to SVG I have
no success. I can view this file in Adobe SVG Viewer, I can transcode
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10941.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14657.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=839.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6178.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6230.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with
downloading via IE.
Thanks for pointing this out -- I didn't realize there was a problem. I do
use IE to upload the attachments through Bugzilla. Do you think that is the
source of the problem? Also,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6238.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6230.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6230.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8819.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12809.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It's me.
It is bug 14539 in Bugzilla.
It's just that in you have a comment before the root element, the SAX
startDocument is called two times.
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 November, 2002 15:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
So, could you check if the problem persist when using a Xerces 2.2.1?
Thanks.
On 19.11.2002 20:10:30 Bernard D'Have wrote:
It's me.
It is bug 14539 in Bugzilla.
It's just that in you have a comment before the root element, the SAX
startDocument is called two times.
Jeremias Maerki
I'll check this tomorrow at work.
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 November, 2002 20:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Xerces 2.2.1
So, could you check if the problem persist when using a Xerces 2.2.1?
Thanks.
On
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14290.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all (and especially Jeremias or other font experts),
This bug seems to be due to the way we generate the 'loca' table in the
embedded font subsets (CID fonts). In fact, it has offsets to the
correct glyph descriptions, but the offsets are not in ascending order.
Since it seems that the
Hi guys,
If the problem is that the link rectangles are now merged by default, I
am the one that changed it. There was a bug:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9335
and I was doing a bunch of improvements to the positioning of the link
rectangles. However, in this case, all I
A while back, if I remember correctly, someone was looking for and
perhaps going to write an extension to write continued labels in table
headers. Ie, when the table continues, to add text like (continued) or
whatever in the header (and/or footer).
Apparently this never made it into the common
Karen Lease wrote:
A while back, if I remember correctly, someone was looking for and
perhaps going to write an extension to write continued labels in table
headers. Ie, when the table continues, to add text like (continued) or
whatever in the header (and/or footer).
Just yesterday there was
Bernard,
Ah, memory! Wonderful thing when it works. I must remember to read
Proust again.
I wanted to talk to you about this. I haven't yet followed up on your
fix to this, so I am not sure how you handle it, but wouldn't the
variable and the process be better as startDocumentAlreadySeen?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12809.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 18:59, Victor Mote wrote:
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with
downloading via IE.
Thanks for pointing this out -- I didn't realize there was a problem. I do
use IE to upload the attachments through Bugzilla.
The problem is with the viewBox, this is not implemented properly in the
releases.
It has been implemented in cvs however.
Why don't you use a circle to draw a circle?
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 18:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I tried to include some svg graphics with
keiron 2002/11/19 23:51:35
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/pdf PDFDocument.java PDFInfo.java
src/org/apache/fop/render AbstractRenderer.java
Renderer.java
src/org/apache/fop/render/pdf PDFRenderer.java
Log:
enable setting creator
60 matches
Mail list logo
