Bug report for Fop [2003/09/14]

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: FOP updated to new Batik API

2003-09-14 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Glen Mazza wrote: Patch applied! But please be careful to keep all if-statements within braces--for the second patch, the change at line 500 made the code look somewhat vague as to your intentions (see below--I fixed it though). Ahh yah, sorry for the confusion. You say you 'fixed it', you

Re: FOP updated to new Batik API

2003-09-14 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Thomas DeWeese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You say you 'fixed it', you should not have moved the result stuff into the if. No, I did not--it was *reformatted* correctly I meant! Glen __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/render AbstractRenderer.java

2003-09-14 Thread gmazza
gmazza 2003/09/14 12:32:44 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/render AbstractRenderer.java Log: Change to have the fo:region-body display on top in cases of overlap with the other fo:regions. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +6 -2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23166] - [PATCH] RTF: support for fo:table

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23166. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23166] - [PATCH] RTF: support for fo:table

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23166. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23166] - [PATCH] RTF: support for fo:table

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23166. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23166] - [PATCH] RTF: support for fo:table

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23166. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23166] - [PATCH] RTF: support for fo:table

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23166. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23166] - [PATCH] RTF: support for fo:table

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23166. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-14 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I added in a new Batik extension element mapping in our main trunk code--this should help you. It is not Glen, I'm just being curious: did my remarks turn out to be helpful here? (I just want to check to what extent I'm

RE: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-14 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just being curious: did my remarks turn out to be helpful here? (I just want to check to what extent I'm beginning to understand the internals of the application...) I was happy to see you going through the source code. Also welcome to