DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
After 'fixing' the master-reference issue in my copy of the NIST test
suite, I ran the tests against 0.20.5 and 1.0dev and merged the result
side by side into a single .pdf file.
You can download the result (1Mb) here:
http://bckfnn-modules.sf.net/out-0.20.5-1.0.pdf
For some reason
On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 11:42, Finn Bock wrote:
Hi,
After 'fixing' the master-reference issue in my copy of the NIST test
suite, I ran the tests against 0.20.5 and 1.0dev and merged the result
side by side into a single .pdf file.
Interesting technique.
What tool do you use to make the
After 'fixing' the master-reference issue in my copy of the NIST test
suite, I ran the tests against 0.20.5 and 1.0dev and merged the result
side by side into a single .pdf file.
[John Austin]
Interesting technique.
What tool do you use to make the side-by-side comparison ?
This java program:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 11:42, Finn Bock wrote:
Hi,
After 'fixing' the master-reference issue in my copy of the NIST test
suite, I ran the tests against 0.20.5 and 1.0dev and merged the result
side by side into a single .pdf file.
You can download the result (1Mb) here:
John Austin wrote:
RedHat 9.0 (my system anyhow) includes a command 'pdftopbm' that will
convert a PDF to multiple PBM (protable Bit Map) files that might be
comparable.
...
It would certainly help detect pixel-sized changes.
That might help regression testing.
We need regression tests badly. Some
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Glen Mazza wrote:
Therefore, I'm
happy to nominate Finn Bock for committer
+1
+1
+1
--
Peter B. West http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html
Glen Mazza wrote:
Yes, thankfully Bertrand came to the rescue for us
here!
+1
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year everyone!
+1
--- Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Happy Holidays ( to everyone who cares ) !
Peter
--
Peter B. West http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html
Regarding the recent discussion of space and line break characteristics,
I recall that Karen was engaged in a very protracted discussion with the
editors on aspects of these questions. At one stage they specified a
new property usage-context-of-suppress-at-line-break to resolve issues
Karen
15 matches
Mail list logo