Finn Bock wrote:
I've been playing around with the knuth line breaking code and made a
slight refactoring of it. [...]
These improvements could also be applied to the existing code, so I
think the more interesting point is the quality of the refactoring
job.
I think this is a very good
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1
Finn Bock wrote:
Did you notice that if a FOTree (or a fragment of it) is
serialized to a preorder sequential representation with end
markers, the preorder, postorder and child events can be
fired directly from the input stream?
IOW the event based layout can work both of a normal
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Simon Pepping wrote:
The code you presented seems to be an algorithm implementing
an iterator over a tree. Because it maintains its state, it
can be stopped and resumed at will, provided you keep a
reference to it.
If LMIter would have a reference to its parent LMIter, and
could return
The code you presented seems to be an algorithm implementing an
iterator over a tree. Because it maintains its state, it can be
stopped and resumed at will, provided you keep a reference to it.
If LMIter would have a reference to its parent LMIter, and could
return to it after having processed
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Moderators,
please be a bit more careful. This seems to be a phishing attempt. Also,
Hey, I'm innocent ;-|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was subscribed to fop-dev (unsubscribed now) so there
wasn't much I could have done as a moderator.
The same mail for fop-user ended up as moderation
Hmm, sorry, I didn't take into account that this address could be
properly subscribed. I wonder how they did this because I don't think
PayPal would use such an address to monitor our mailing lists. Very
strange. I don't think it makes sense to moderate all messages.
Thanks for unsubscribing the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
