Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-09 Thread Louis . Masters
need any help. -Lou Arved Sandstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 12:26:11 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 Hi, Lou It's probably easiest for me to fix up marker support, since I threw the existing code in there in

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-08 Thread Arved Sandstrom
e code and start looking through it. > -Lou > > Alex McLintock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 12:38:26 PM > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > > Subject: RE: ETA on 0.20.2 > > --- COFFMAN Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-08 Thread Louis . Masters
Thanks. However, due to firewall issues, I can't get to your FAQ. I'm going to pull the source code and start looking through it. -Lou Alex McLintock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 12:38:26 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subj

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-08 Thread Louis . Masters
Steve: I get the message. -Lou COFFMAN Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 12:30:39 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: ETA on 0.20.2 No set date has been committed to. If you rea

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-08 Thread Alex McLintock
--- COFFMAN Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No set date has been committed to. If you really need marker support, we'd > be happy to get any patches you'd care to send. We are, after all, > developing on a completely volunteer basis. > -Steve There was however at least one company willing t

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-08 Thread COFFMAN Steven
October 08, 2001 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 OK, but when will marker support be fixed? -Lou Arved Sandstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 09:55:47 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 At

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-08 Thread Louis . Masters
OK, but when will marker support be fixed? -Lou Arved Sandstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 09:55:47 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 At 09:07 AM 10/8/01 -0400, Louis Masters wrote: >When will 0.20.2RC b

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-08 Thread Arved Sandstrom
At 09:07 AM 10/8/01 -0400, Louis Masters wrote: >When will 0.20.2RC become the official release? I REALLY need those >markers. >-Lou There seems to have been a lack of communication here, or some confusion. FOP-0.20.2 (and the RC is good to go, essentially...the only thing that is holding me u

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-10-08 Thread Louis . Masters
D] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 We should probably have a 0.21 release sometime in the next two weeks. Things that will need doing are: - testing for any unnoticed problems - building and putting the release on the server - update the website to reflect the new v

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-09-19 Thread Karen Lease
Hi Keiron, I'll fix the bug 3531 (column-number attribute not working on table-column) before the release unless you're already working on it. Also willing to give a hand with updating the website. Regards, Karen PS. I'm working away on LayoutManager ideas and hope to contribute something befor

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-09-19 Thread Michel Lehon
Hummm Hummm... no comment... I need more sleep. Thanks Keiron. Michel. > -Original Message- > From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 19 September, 2001 11:33 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 > > > On Tue, 18

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-09-19 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:19:50 Michel Lehon wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated my local CVS copy to test a few things, and I cant build > it. > I get compile error in SVGObj and SVGElement. > > Is that normal ? Any fix? I think you just need to do a build clean first. --

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-09-18 Thread Jim Wright
When the time comes, if you get me the 0.20.1 release, and what's new, I can at least run it through testing. jw -Original Message- From: Arved Sandstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 If no

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-09-18 Thread Arved Sandstrom
oing to help out? > >On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:35:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Any ETA on 0.20.2? I really need markers to implement running headers. >> Thanks, >> Lou > >- >To unsubscribe,

RE: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-09-18 Thread Michel Lehon
September, 2001 12:03 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 > > > We should probably have a 0.21 release sometime in the next two weeks. > > Things that will need doing are: > - testing for any unnoticed problems > - building and putting the release on

Re: ETA on 0.20.2

2001-09-18 Thread Keiron Liddle
hold on new features or major changes for a few days and then when everything is done it will be available. So who is going to help out? On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:35:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any ETA on 0.20.2? I really need markers to implement running headers. > Thanks,

ETA on 0.20.2

2001-09-17 Thread Louis . Masters
Any ETA on 0.20.2? I really need markers to implement running headers. Thanks, Lou - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]