No, it doesn't put me off.
I think the direction I will take is to focus on the
list-item-label and list-item-body. Since, both are
required in a list-item, it seems like a limited
enough case that it might not be as hard as the
general case.
Don
--- Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Total agreement to everything Keiron just said.
However, that's not to say that we can't work up something that meets your
needs for 'keep-together' on fo:list-item. It's usually possible to take
care of a specific; as Keiron says it's the general case (making keeps work
everywhere that they a
Your help is very welcome.
Unfortunately the the solution to the problem is not that easy. This is one
area that fop does not handle very well and we are in search of a solution.
The problem of keeps (and space resolution etc.) is one that spans across
the fo heirarchy in a number of directions
Hi-
Well, I am trying to make my first contribution to
FOP. By working on bug 2988 which I submitted. I
willingly accept any and all help.
I tried forcing the status return from
ListItemLabel.layout to keep-with-next in an attempt
to force other code to handle keeping the
list-item-label and li
