Re: PS Renderer.

2003-07-21 Thread IvanLatysh
Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:59:19 +0200: JM> I hear you. Incidentally, I've had the same problem reported to me JM> via a different channel. Funny things happen. JM> I've checked the PPD of the HP Laserjet 5. It supports the PageSize JM> setting. S

Re: PS Renderer.

2003-07-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I hear you. Incidentally, I've had the same problem reported to me via a different channel. Funny things happen. I've checked the PPD of the HP Laserjet 5. It supports the PageSize setting. So my reservation was a bit premature. Looks like your proposal shouldn't hurt. On 21.07.2003 16:26:54 Ivan

Re: PS Renderer.

2003-07-21 Thread IvanLatysh
Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:02:36 +0200: JM> Hello Ivan JM> You're right, this could be a way to go. But I'm not sure if this JM> approach is supported by all PostScript printers, especially the HP JM> ones where quite a few things are special. So

Re: PS Renderer.

2003-07-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hello Ivan You're right, this could be a way to go. But I'm not sure if this approach is supported by all PostScript printers, especially the HP ones where quite a few things are special. So basically it comes down to the problem of being able to test on various printers. I can test the current co

Re: PS renderer 1

2003-03-11 Thread Zhong Yi
Will do. --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Committed to CVS. Thanks a lot. The tiger looks REAL > nice now!!! :-) > Great work. I hope we can expect more from you. > > A little request: Could you please synchronize with > CVS before creating > and submitting a patch? I had to redo

Re: PS renderer 1

2003-03-11 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Committed to CVS. Thanks a lot. The tiger looks REAL nice now!!! :-) Great work. I hope we can expect more from you. A little request: Could you please synchronize with CVS before creating and submitting a patch? I had to redo the changes I did last week. It was no big deal but it would save me so

RE: PS Renderer Enhancement

2003-01-17 Thread George Yi
Please ignore this implementation. It's incorrect. I will keep working on it though:-) -Original Message- From: George Yi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PS Renderer Enhancement SEG_QUADTO was not implemented in PSGraphic

Re: PS Renderer patch

2002-06-10 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks! I'll look at it, although I've already fixed image positioning in the meantime. I hope I can get the code in this evening. > yes, I have activated "shrink oversized paper to paper size" and > "auto-rotate and center pages" checkboxes in Acrobat reader. This is a = > cause > of diffrent la

RE: PS Renderer patch

2002-06-10 Thread Huikang Xu
eArea method and get that work. Attached is a new PSRenderer source code(based on fop0.20.3). Regards, Huikang -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 10 June, 2002 6:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PS Renderer patch Hi Huikang I had to

Re: PS Renderer patch

2002-06-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Huikang I had to work with the plain java file you posted instead of the diff, because the diff seems to be made against the CVS HEAD branch instead of the maintenance branch. Anyway, using another differ I was able to extract your changes. It's still in the works, amoung other things I'm curr

RE: PS Renderer patch

2002-05-28 Thread Huikang Xu
The coordinate x/y is defined in AbstractRenderer and PSRenderer use this coordinate when render a line or image. Actually, I shrink whole page and relocate it, adjust the image y position. BTW, I worked with fop-0.20.3 source file not the current CVS version. Huikang -Original Message-

RE: PS Renderer patch

2002-05-26 Thread Huikang Xu
h Fop-0.20.3 but not current CVS. Regards. Huikang -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 23 May, 2002 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PS Renderer patch Sure, that's great. All you have to do is make your changes against the c

RE: PS Renderer patch

2002-05-26 Thread Huikang Xu
hough we noted that the size of border and table in PDF file is smaller than it should be. Regards. Huikang -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 23 May, 2002 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PS Renderer patch Sure, that's

Re: PS Renderer patch

2002-05-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Sure, that's great. All you have to do is make your changes against the current CVS, create a unified diff with CVS and send it to this list or create a new bugzilla entry with the diff as attachment. We will then see to include it as fast as possible. See here for more information: http://xml.ap

RE: PS Renderer patch

2002-05-22 Thread Huikang Xu
Hi We are using FOP to generate PostScript and PDF file by XSL. It works fine. But we also found a little minor difference compare ps to pdf, such as, the position and size of border, table and font, the vertical position of image. You can test that with docs/examples/fo/border.fo by printing th