Re: fo validation issue

2002-10-20 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Peter B. West wrote: I don't know schematron, so we may be talking at cross-purposes here. Well, schematron is extremely simple while powerful rule-based schema language, see the overview [1]. I'd say if you know xslt and xpath, you know schematron. For example, consider the following xsl con

Re: problem with size of characters within

2002-10-20 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Arjan Loeffen / Salience BV wrote: Thanks for the answers so far; I understand that the problem I indicated is known and being fixed? Wait a minute, I just realized xml spy's pretty-print formatting transforms your () into ( ) and this way adds whitespaces here. So it need to be verified again

Re: problem with size of characters within

2002-10-20 Thread Arjan Loeffen / Salience BV
Oleg, I downloaded 0.20.4 and this did not solve the problem. When will 0.20.5 be released? Thanks for the answers so far; I understand that the problem I indicated is known and being fixed? The problem is so severe to us that we cannot produce documentation, with many page references, using FO

Re: fo validation issue

2002-10-20 Thread Peter B. West
BALI: In Memoriam Oleg Tkachenko wrote: ... Well, schematron is extremely simple while powerful rule-based schema language, see the overview [1]. I'd say if you know xslt and xpath, you know schematron. For example, consider the following xsl constraint: "It is an error if the fo:footnote occ

Re: fo validation issue

2002-10-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
Peter B. West wrote: In a pull model, as distinct from the peephole processing model encouraged by SAX, this is easy, because you know where you are at all times; e.g., whether you are within an fo:flow, or more specifically, whether you are descending within an "out-of-line" formatting object.

Re: problem with size of characters within

2002-10-20 Thread Arjan Loeffen / Salience BV
I tried this (see web page referenced in other mail): a b c () a b c I also tried fo:wrapper, but it didn't help.. arjan J.Pietschmann wrote: Arjan Loeffen / Salience BV wrote: Dear people, it seems that FOP has a problem when character features are set in the context of a page ref

Re: Root element is required in a well-formed document

2002-10-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
Venkata Rao Nadella wrote: I am trying to convert XML File to PDF using FOP. I am getting following error although root element is present. [ERROR]: The root element is required in a well-formed document. Can someone help me in figuring out why I am getting this error? This has also happened

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13699] - PDF-Renderer Not Threadsafe

2002-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu