cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo PropertyList.java

2002-12-19 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/12/19 00:12:04 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo PropertyList.java Log: compare to correct string Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +2 -2 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/PropertyList.java Index: PropertyList.java ==

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/image ImageFactory.java

2002-12-19 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/12/19 00:13:18 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/image ImageFactory.java Log: add method to remove context Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +10 -1 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/image/ImageFactory.java Index: ImageFactory.java =

Re: Setting baseDir in a servlet environment.

2002-12-19 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I ended up using a XSL parameter instead of baseDir. Can you tell me if driver.render is thread safe. Can I have more than one conversion running at the same time? I think so (fop.0.20.5rc). I have it in a production web server and it works well under resonably big l

Happy Holidays

2002-12-19 Thread Arved Sandstrom
I'd like to wish everyone here happy holidays, whatever is appropriate. This is a good crowd. Regards, Arved Sandstrom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bidi in the branch

2002-12-19 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Hello there! I know, shame on me, shame on me, but I've implemented partial bidi support in the branch. Sorry, it was urgent commercial requirement. It seems to be working ok (QA is still verifying it though), but of course it's a patch actually and I don't like it much. My question is: should I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15541] New: - Font Support Bug In "embed-file" Attribute

2002-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15541] - Font Support Bug In "embed-file" Attribute

2002-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: PDF transforms (was: Re: File prefix again)

2002-12-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
All cool, but how exactly is that better than having a PDF template that is stitched behind or in front of the FOP result using iText or PJ? Works well. Ok, PDF reading with our own library is a bonus as is better XML output for debugging. But I don't see any immediate need for this at the moment g

Re: bidi in the branch

2002-12-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
:-) Ok, you're sentenced to implement the same functionality in the trunk. I'm -0 for the inclusion in the branch as it sends the wrong message IMO. But I'm looking forward to seeing bidi support in action in the trunk. On 19.12.2002 18:11:02 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: > Hello there! > > I know, shame

Re: bidi in the branch

2002-12-19 Thread Peter B. West
Jeremias Maerki wrote: :-) Ok, you're sentenced to implement the same functionality in the trunk. I'm -0 for the inclusion in the branch as it sends the wrong message IMO. But I'm looking forward to seeing bidi support in action in the trunk. Jeremias, I would encourage Oleg to bring this funct