Re: Which area rectangle does Block.height and Block.width specify?

I was looking at some of the border issues and would like to ask for a little clarification of which of area rectangle that is described by Block.getHeight and Block.getWidth. [Keiron Liddle] I think the intention was that it is the allocation width and height, the content is then calculated fr

[VOTE] Chris Bowditch for Committer

In recognition for his contributions to this project I'd like to propose Chris Bowditch as a FOP committer. He's active on both dev and user mailing lists for at least 18 months now. He's actively helping out on the user mailing list and shows interest in FOP development. Provided he accepts the no

[VOTE] Clay Leeds for committer

In recognition for his contributions to this project I'd like to propose "Web Maestro" Clay Leeds as a FOP committer. He's active on both dev and user mailing lists for at least 1 year now. He's actively helping out on the user mailing list and as our favourite nit-picker :-) he was instrumental in

[VOTE] Andreas L. Delmelle for committer

In recognition for his contributions to this project I'd like to propose Andreas L. Delmelle as a FOP committer. He's active on both dev and user mailing lists for over 6 months now. He's actively helping out on the user mailing list and shows interest in FOP development. Provided he accepts the no

Re: Trying to use the NIST test suite.

(comments inline) On 24.12.2003 19:02:41 Clay Leeds wrote: > On Dec 24, 2003, at 8:55 AM, Bernd Brandstetter wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 December 2003 15:39, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > >> Apparently this was admitted by earlier versions of the spec. Older > >> versions of FOP still supported this

Re: Output from NIST test suite

You may also want to check the mailing list archives. Especially Joerg and I have discussed this a number of times. GhostScript paired with an image differ would be my favourite approach. On 25.12.2003 16:12:44 Finn Bock wrote: > Another way of using the test suite could be to compare a binary ima

Bug report for Fop [2003/12/28]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo FObj.java

gmazza 2003/12/28 08:13:10 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo FObj.java Log: Minor patch for fixing NPE error when Locator not available--submitted by Finn Bock. Revision ChangesPath 1.30 +5 -3 xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/FObj.java Index: FObj.ja

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25646] - [PATCH] line and column numbers on fo:elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25773] - [PATCH] width, height, border and background support for block-container.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr BlockContainerLayoutManager.java

gmazza 2003/12/28 09:10:17 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/area Block.java src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow BasicLink.java ExternalGraphic.java InstreamForeignObject.java Leader.java ListBlock.java ListItem.java

Re: [VOTE] Clay Leeds for committer

-1 (veto) Glen --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In recognition for his contributions to this project > I'd like to propose > "Web Maestro" Clay Leeds as a FOP committer. He's > active on both dev and > user mailing lists for at least 1 year now. He's > actively helping out on > th

Re: [VOTE] Andreas L. Delmelle for committer

"Shows interest in FOP Development"?!? He hasn't submitted a single patch. -1 Glen (who "shows interest" in getting a Ph D, so just give me one.) --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In recognition for his contributions to this project > I'd like to propose > Andreas L. Delmelle as

PDFTranscoder & Batik library in FOP 1.0

Looking through the old posts I noticed that it seems that there is a special version of Batik library being checked in with FOP. Is there any way to find out what version of Batik source code does this Batik JAR in FOP 1.0 correspond to? Is this just a snapshot of Batik at some point (1.5 for ex

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25773] - [PATCH] width, height, border and background support for block-container.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Chris Bowditch for Committer

Good idea. Actually, more than "showing interest in FOP development", Chris has already submitted substantive patches in layout (the most complex part of our system) with welcome enthusiasm. He's also a competent Java and XSLT developer in his own right, i.e. outside of FOP, and hence can be trus

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs team.xml

gmazza 2003/12/28 11:01:52 Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs team.xml Log: Added Simon Pepping to contributors list. Revision ChangesPath 1.22 +7 -1 xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/team.xml Index: team.xml =

Re: [VOTE] Clay Leeds for committer

A veto must always be accompanied by an explanation. Without an explanation a veto is invalid. http://incubator.apache.org/learn/voting.html Clay has never submitted any Java-related patches but he cares about the website (and has submitted patches in this area) and helps on the user mailing list

Re: PDFTranscoder & Batik library in FOP 1.0

Current batik.jar is from Oct 11 2003 and is a snapshot from CVS if I read the commit message right. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/lib/batik.jar Whether it works with Batik 1.5 I can't tell. But I hope so. If not, that API should finally get nailed down. On 28.12.2003 19:11:21 Petar

Re: [VOTE] Andreas L. Delmelle for committer

I can accept that although I would have chosen a different wording. Andreas was the one I was least sure about. The reason I proposed him is that he's here, he's active, trying to keep up and he's actively helping on the user mailing list which can also be acknowledged. BTW you can buy your PhD on

RE: [VOTE] Andreas L. Delmelle for committer

> -Original Message- > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Shows interest in FOP Development"?!? He hasn't > submitted a single patch. > > -1 Granted. Besides that, six months ain't that long a time, so maybe a bit early. Nomination very much appreciated though. I guess Jerem

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25786] New: - [PATCH] First minor attempt at cleanup...

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25786] - [PATCH] First minor attempt at cleanup...

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25786] - [PATCH] First minor attempt at cleanup...

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu