DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32153] New: - Unwanted whitespace around image

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32153. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

remove LayoutManager.initialize()?

2004-11-10 Thread Glen Mazza
Team, Does anyone have a problem if I worked towards removing the initialize() method from our LayoutManager interface? The relatively few cases in our LM subclasses where we are using it each appear to show that they can initialize themselves -- the method is currently only being used to query

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32153] - Unwanted whitespace around image

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32153. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[URGENT] Quarterly report for November meeting

2004-11-10 Thread Jeremias Maerki
We need to prepare our first board report for the XML Graphics project. I've filled in as much as I could. PMCers, please add anything you think is missing (especially Thomas for the Batik part). http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?XMLGraphicsProjectPages/StatusReportForNovember2004 I

RE: remove LayoutManager.initialize()?

2004-11-10 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Glen, Does anyone have a problem if I worked towards removing the initialize() method from our LayoutManager interface? No objections here at first glance, however ... (see below) The relatively few cases in our

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19216] - Links do not work properly if included two adjacent columns in a table

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19216. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: remove LayoutManager.initialize()?

2004-11-10 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 06:37:28AM -0800, Glen Mazza wrote: Team, Does anyone have a problem if I worked towards removing the initialize() method from our LayoutManager interface? The relatively few cases in our LM subclasses where we are using it each appear to show that they can

Re: remove LayoutManager.initialize()?

2004-11-10 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is a hook for doing those initialization actions which for some reason cannot be done in the constructor. I have no idea which actions that could be. Even if a few such actions exist--I don't know any yet--I'm thinking those can still

Re: remove LayoutManager.initialize()?

2004-11-10 Thread Glen Mazza
Oops, the link [1] below was the code that originally added initialize() (as init()) into the interface. [1] http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/Attic/LayoutManager.java?r1=1.7r2=1.8diff_format=h

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32174] New: - Rendering fails with IndexOutOfBoundsException in LineLayoutManager

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32174. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: remove LayoutManager.initialize()?

2004-11-10 Thread Finn Bock
[Glen] Does anyone have a problem if I worked towards removing the initialize() method from our LayoutManager interface? There is two way of looking at it. The code in initProperties() which can be moved to the ctor should be. That is no loss at all and will reduce complexity of the LMs a tiny