Now that we've got someone who will work on the AWT Renderer I'd like to
know if someone is against renaming the AWT Renderer to Java2D Renderer.
The API in use is actually the Java2D API [1], although most of the
classes had their origin within AWT (and are still in there). AWT is
actually the win
Clay,
he knows that. I told him to use the maintenance branch code as a
reference for bringing back the AWT Renderer in CVS HEAD. Renaud and I
met last Friday at lots.ch.
So, Renaud, please use the code found under the "fop-0_20_2-maintain"
branch for reference. And happy hacking!
On 22.02.2005
On Feb 21, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Renaud Richardet wrote:
bonjour fop-devs
Salut! Bienvenue!
i would like to work on the awt renderer. Mark (or someone else) , are
you working on it?
i checked out the code from FOP 0.20.5. is it the latest maintenance
version?
thanks, renaud
Actually, the fop-0.20.5 c
Renaud et al
I've had less time to devote to it than I thought, but I am working my
way carefully through the spec (and trying to keep up with the posts to
fop-dev). The bottom line is that I'm not actively working on the code
yet - I hope to be by April. So, if you've got time now, you shou
bonjour fop-devs
i would like to work on the awt renderer. Mark (or someone else) , are
you working on it?
i checked out the code from FOP 0.20.5. is it the latest maintenance version?
thanks, renaud
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:54:43 +0100, Jeremias Maerki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> We
Ah yes, that makes sense. Thanks a lot Vincent. I didn't think about
that.
On 21.02.2005 21:54:19 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> > Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the
> > conditional part of a (ex. in border-before-width)
> > has no effect (i.e.
Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the
conditional part of a (ex. in border-before-width)
has no effect (i.e. is ignored)?
I would answer no, actually not exactly.
If I understand the spec correctly, the conditional part has an effect only if
the
Then, I'm wondering how to handle the conditional part (7.7.9) in this
case because I don't have a clue and it seems not to go well with the
collapsing nature of these borders as well as the rules 1-5 in 6.7.10
for border-collapse="collapse". Also, I don't think "the associated edge
is (can be) a l
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model
> the conditional part of a (ex. in
> border-before-width) has no effect (i.e. is ignored)?
That doesn't sound right. I just did a cursory review of the standard and
can't find any support for that. However, t
Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the
conditional part of a (ex. in border-before-width)
has no effect (i.e. is ignored)?
Thanks,
Jeremias Maerki
10 matches
Mail list logo