Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters

2003-03-21 Thread IvanLatysh
Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:38:15 +0100: JM Two possibilities: JM - Subclass the PostScript renderer and try to find the right place JM for your special commands. You can then set the subclassed JM renderer in the JM Driver using

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters

2003-03-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 21.03.2003 19:06:54 IvanLatysh wrote: Is there are somehow possible to embedd PS command in XSL file, and this command will be included in resulting PS file. This approach will be very useful. In the redesign that should be relatively simple. Can't say offhand how difficult this would be

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters

2003-03-21 Thread IvanLatysh
Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:14:59 +0100: JM In the redesign that should be relatively simple. Can't say offhand JM how difficult this would be in the old FOP. The way to go is to JM implement an extension. See the website and mailing list archives JM

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters

2003-03-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 21.03.2003 21:21:46 IvanLatysh wrote: Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:14:59 +0100: JM In the redesign that should be relatively simple. Can't say offhand JM how difficult this would be in the old FOP. The way to go is to JM implement an

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters

2003-03-21 Thread IvanLatysh
Hello, Jeremias! You wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:30:34 +0100: JM Immediately, if you download from CVS. Seriously, a release is still JM some time away. We don't know when that will be. Depends on the help JM we get and how much time we have to work on FOP. Maybe you

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters in PCL

2001-10-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On Brian T. Wolf wrote: We are working on that as well, though I don't have any good solutions yet either. If you run across something please let me know. Just as an FYI, I tried hardcoding a duplex print escape sequence into PCLRenderer.java and it printed both sides as expected. So I

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters in PCL

2001-10-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On -MM-ddT Brian T. Wolf wrote: We are working on that as well, though I don't have any good solutions yet either. If you run across something please let me know. Just as an FYI, I tried hardcoding a duplex print escape sequence into PCLRenderer.java and it printed both sides as

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters in PCL

2001-10-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On -MM-ddT Brian T. Wolf wrote: We are working on that as well, though I don't have any good solutions yet either. If you run across something please let me know. Just as an FYI, I tried hardcoding a duplex print escape sequence into PCLRenderer.java and it printed both sides as

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters in PCL

2001-10-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
That's also going to be an issue for the PostScript renderer, when we want to apply individual PPDs (Files that contain control commands for individual printers) or controlling the PostScript Level to be used. What comes to my mind as an idea is a FOP extension where we can supply some

Re: Embedding Printer Control parameters in PCL

2001-10-12 Thread Brian T. Wolf
We are working on that as well, though I don't have any good solutions yet either. If you run across something please let me know. Just as an FYI, I tried hardcoding a duplex print escape sequence into PCLRenderer.java and it printed both sides as expected. So I figure once we solve how to pass