.
Matthias Fischer
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Matthias Fischer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)
[...]
In the meantime, I'd encourage users that find
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 09:59, Matthias Fischer wrote:
Right now, I have a pice of code I would contribute. It would be useful, if
there were an alternative e-mail address to that of the list, to collect
the submitted code segments.
ok, right now we don't have an alternative address
sure that everybody builds upon the same basis. It would make the samples
more easily comparable.
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Matthias Fischer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects
visited the site.
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Carmelo Montanez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthias Fischer
Subject: Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)
Hi all
On Monday 17 December 2001 09:07, Matthias Fischer wrote:
What are _your_ plans with regard to the material offered by W3C/Carmelo?
As mentioned by Keiron (see http://xml.apache.org/fop/testing.html), the
current FOP tests are based on automatically comparing the ouput
of two FOP revisions.
Thank you, Bertrand.
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Matthias Fischer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)
[...]
In the meantime, I'd encourage users
On Friday 14 December 2001 10:05, Matthias Fischer wrote:
However, you won't escape big maintenance so easily:
Right - maintaining such a test suite is not light work.
The advantage over pure documentation, however, is that both users and
developers directly benefit from having strong test
Hi all:
Regarding the FO test suite. We at NIST in conjunction with the W3C
Developed
a test suite for FO. The site is:
www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
We are also working on expanding that work to include ALL of the basic
aspects of the language. We expect to have close to 5000 tests
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects
[...]
When you say documentation, I take it you mean operating instructions,
rather than stuff about XSL per se. Correct
I presume that was a frustrated email :)
One point I have to make:
You say that you have gone through all the problems and eventually sorted
them out after working through it etc.
Yet after solving the problem you did not write to the list and say (to my
knowledge): I have worked out how to
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects
I presume that was a frustrated email :)
One point I have to make:
You say that you have gone through all the problems and eventually sorted
them out after working through it etc.
Yet after
: Re: Basic aspects
Please respond to fop-dev
Title: RE: Basic aspects
There already IS a user mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2001 16:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects
Perhaps it would be useful to set
--- Sander, Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There already IS a user mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It isn't listed on the page
http://xml.apache.org/mail.html
Perhaps someone with commit permission to the site cvs could change that.
Alex McLintock
=
Alex McLintock
On Thursday 13 December 2001 15:35, Matthias Fischer wrote:
. . .
My whish to Santa Clause this year: A big fat list containing all major
graphic formats and the FO/FOP-related aspects that concern them.
. . .
I'm skeptical: to me big fat list means big maintenance work and usually
15 matches
Mail list logo
