Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-24 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Jay Chiu wrote: Glen, The reason that the svg portion does not work in Batik Squiggle is because of the namespace. The embedded svg needs "svg:" prefix and probably "batik:" prefix for flowText elements. Attached please find a svg file that works in squiggle. I tried three different ways to embe

Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-23 Thread Glen Mazza
Quite possibly. FOP does not appear ready for your needs at this time. Glen --- Jay Chiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have not seen the error "[ERROR] findHyphenPoss: > problem!" in > previous FOP versions. Could it be some recent > change causing > this problem? > > Thanks. > > Jay > >

Re: Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-21 Thread Glen Mazza
I think I got the same result you did. I'll look into the problem. Glen --- Jay Chiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got the hanging problem when I used command > "fop.bat xx.fo > xx.pdf". However FOP does NOT hang, when I run it in > IntelliJ. > Probably it relates to the JDK classpath. > > But

Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-20 Thread Glen Mazza
Jay, Thanks for checking and sorry for the delay--Isabel took away my electricity for two days. Like Andreas, I didn't see the hanging you mentioned. Also, your error message was the "hyphenation issue" I mentioned below--those will occur, which I'm sadly not trained to fix right now--I'm on othe

Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-20 Thread Glen Mazza
If he's using the transcoder, he has no other choice (fortunately)--that's the only place where they are supported. Glen --- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > > I've just been running the same test ( > examples/fo/advanced/giro.fo ) and > > received the sam

Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: I've just been running the same test ( examples/fo/advanced/giro.fo ) and received the same 'hyphenation errors'. That's a known problem of the HEAD code. Are you sure you want to use this? J.Pietschmann

RE: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-20 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Jay Chiu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank you for help. But the fop of cvs snapshot hangs on > processing fo file. > > I tried today's packages, 20030919221605 and 20030919041528, > untar'ed and ran build.bat to create fop.jar file on XP machine. > Then I ran

RE: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-14 Thread Glen Mazza
--- "Andreas L. Delmelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm just being curious: did my remarks turn out to > be helpful here? (I just > want to check to what extent I'm beginning to > understand the internals of > the application...) > I was happy to see you going through the source code. Also we

RE: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-14 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I added in a new Batik extension element mapping in > our main trunk code--this should help you. It is not Glen, I'm just being curious: did my remarks turn out to be helpful here? (I just want to check to what extent