Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen, what are your
plans for
apps/FOInputHandler? Will it be going away or get
renamed anyway? I have
been using Handler as related to SAX events, and
it looks like we have it
also being used as I/O in a more raw form.
Victor--
After looking over the new design, I like it. Please
keep your FOInputHandler abstract base class as-named.
FOTreeHandler also is a very good name.
I'd like to keep, however, at least for the time
being, the naming convention in fop.apps with
InputHandler as well. It's the command
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen, what are your
plans for
apps/FOInputHandler? Will it be going away or get
renamed anyway? I have
been using Handler as related to SAX events, and
it looks like we have it
also being used as I/O in a more raw form.
Here's my thoughts on this
