> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Arnd,
> As far as I understand the spec, table-column elements with a column-width
> property are mandatory for tables with fixed table layout.
>
*Vry* good point!
Yup, got me there... I was mixing the two
"Andreas L. Delmelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18.05.2004
18:09:15:
> Indeed, but the columns can be absent in the source FO. In which case
> they're actually to be considered present, and their widths are
determined
> by the cells in the first row (--or, but I didn't dare consider that
> po
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi Chris,
> This makes sense - what effect would you expect width on table
> cell to have? I maybe missing something, but the width is
> derived from table column and cant be overridden for a single cell.
>
Indeed,
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
comments below:
Posting this as a follow-up to my earlier ponderings. If we don't get it
implemented, or postpone this one indefinitely, at least we'll have it
nicely summed up for possible future use... (Who knows, maybe parts of these
remarks can be used to implement th
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> BTW, Andreas, sorry for not responding to your emails
> on this thread, I'm juggling a bit much right now,
Well, don't worry about that... Just posting this all to see if it's just in
my head, or all crazy talk --and if
BTW, Andreas, sorry for not responding to your emails
on this thread, I'm juggling a bit much right now,
both FOP and non-FOP--thankfully Chris at least has
been able to comment on your work, and hopefully I
and/or a few others will be able to add something
later. Thanks for helping us out with th
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Posting this as a follow-up to my earlier ponderings. If we don't get it
implemented, or postpone this one indefinitely, at least we'll have it
nicely summed up for possible future use... (Who knows, maybe parts o
