Re: foray integration

2004-09-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Victor. On 08.09.2004 23:34:24 Victor Mote wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: snip/ What I hope is that you will continue to inform us of any important developments on your side, that you also continue I don't mind doing this if there are no objections to it. I have no wish to intrude or

Re: foray integration

2004-09-09 Thread Simon Pepping
Victor, I share Jeremias' point of view. I see no problem in your informing Bugzilla users of FORay's fixing certain bugs, although I can see that it is a somewhat strange situation. Let us see it as a sign that we do not wish to hurt each other's work, but see each other's project as parallel

RE: foray integration

2004-09-08 Thread Victor Mote
Victor Mote wrote: Does anyone else wish to take up this project? It would seem ... Whether through FOP or FOray, my goal is to get a general release completed before the end of September, so please let me know whether FOP wants to be part of it. I conclude from the silence that FOP

Re: foray integration

2004-09-08 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Victor, silence from my part is simply because I don't have time. It's not that I'm not interested. I'm fighting on too many fronts and have to prioritize. Your first mail in this thread is still marked unread in my mail folder so I keep it on the todo list. What I hope is that you will continue

Re: foray integration

2004-09-08 Thread Clay Leeds
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:00 PM, Victor Mote wrote: Victor Mote wrote: Does anyone else wish to take up this project? It would seem ... Whether through FOP or FOray, my goal is to get a general release completed before the end of September, so please let me know whether FOP wants to be part of it. I

RE: foray integration

2004-09-08 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: silence from my part is simply because I don't have time. It's not that I'm not interested. I'm fighting on too many fronts and have to prioritize. Your first mail in this thread is still marked unread in my mail folder so I keep it on the todo list. I understand

Re: foray integration

2004-09-02 Thread Chris Bowditch
Victor Mote wrote: FOP Devs: I checked in with Chris Bowditch recently to see how his foray work was coming, and he indicated that he has not had, and probably will not have in the near future, enough time to complete the evaluation and make a recommendation to you. Victor is right, I dont have

foray integration

2004-09-01 Thread Victor Mote
FOP Devs: I checked in with Chris Bowditch recently to see how his foray work was coming, and he indicated that he has not had, and probably will not have in the near future, enough time to complete the evaluation and make a recommendation to you. Does anyone else wish to take up this project?

FOray integration to FOP

2004-05-21 Thread Victor Mote
FOP Devs: I apologize for intruding again. After thrashing around for a bit, I concluded that there were an overwhelming number of good reasons for me to import the entire FOP maintenance branch into the FOray repository, then delete and modify as necessary for FOray integration. One

Re: FOray integration to FOP

2004-05-21 Thread Chris Bowditch
and modify as necessary for FOray integration. One of the biggest benefits is that it will greatly simplify any integration that FOP decides to do with Foray. Specifically, I don't have to be in the business of trying to coordinate such integration, and you don't have to listen to me trying to do

Re: FOray integration to FOP

2004-05-21 Thread Clay Leeds
number of good reasons for me to import the entire FOP maintenance branch into the FOray repository, then delete and modify as necessary for FOray integration. One of the biggest benefits is that it will greatly simplify any integration that FOP decides to do with Foray. Specifically, I don't have

Re: FOray integration to FOP

2004-05-21 Thread Clay Leeds
number of good reasons for me to import the entire FOP maintenance branch into the FOray repository, then delete and modify as necessary for FOray integration. One of the biggest benefits is that it will greatly simplify any integration that FOP decides to do with Foray. Specifically, I don't have

RE: FOray integration to FOP

2004-05-21 Thread Victor Mote
Clay Leeds wrote: As you're aware, the Apache Software License 2.0 makes it more cumbersome to include/bundle software that is not ASL. Would you comment on the FOray 'license' and how it will be affected and/or interact with ASL? FOray officially uses the Apache License 2.0. ATM, all

Re: FOray integration to FOP

2004-05-21 Thread Clay Leeds
Thanks for clearing this issue up. I wanted to be sure this information was in the list archives. It might be good to put this on the FOray web site (I looked for licensing info and didn't find any :-)). Web Maestro Clay On May 21, 2004, at 8:12 AM, Victor Mote wrote: Clay Leeds wrote: As

RE: FOray integration to FOP

2004-05-21 Thread Victor Mote
Clay Leeds wrote: It might be good to put this on the FOray web site (I looked for licensing info and didn't find any :-)). Good idea. I just added it to the home page. You can also find it by following the menu item SourceForge Project Page, which will take you here: