Victor Mote wrote:
The #30 on the site is the same as #7, AFAICT. The one you want is attached
to: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=104839511309330&w=2. The
original email message was sent on 2003-3-23, and is from Scott Hofman, if
that helps. I have attached it to this message for your c
My list:
#9 (somehow modified as in
http://cvs.apache.org/~jeremias/fop2-by-Chuck-White-modified.pdf)
#30 (modified)
#13 (without the red dot)
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Hi,
My three would be:
30, 13 and 20
Keiron
> Hello!
>
> I have added #30 as somehow modified #7 and added one new penguin logo.
> Now lets finally finish with this stuff. As Peter suggested lets vote by 3
> favorite logos first.
>
> My list:
> #30
> #2
> #21
>
> PS. Here is the list for you
My vote is unchanged:
#24
#15
#16
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:33 AM 3/30/2003, you wrote:
If non committers may vote, here is my (revised) list of 3
30, 10, [21 and/or 22]
darn, meant to say 30 as modified by Scott Hofman
- the one with the feather moved inside the O of Fop -
its kinda hard to vote for something that isn't on the page of pix ;-)
age-
> From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] logo contest vote, round 1
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I have added #30 as somehow modified #7 and added one new penguin logo.
> Now lets final
AIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] logo contest vote, round 1
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I have added #30 as somehow modified #7 and added one new penguin logo.
> Now lets finally finish with this stuff. As Peter suggested lets
> vote by 3
> favorite logos first.
>
> My list:
>
Hello!
I have added #30 as somehow modified #7 and added one new penguin logo.
Now lets finally finish with this stuff. As Peter suggested lets vote by 3
favorite logos first.
My list:
#30
#2
#21
PS. Here is the list for you convenience:
http://vote.sparklit.com/web_poll.spark/714566
--
Oleg Tk
Peter B. West wrote:
As the modified logo is so popular, we should probably include it in the
list for voting, and let those who like it change their vote. Let's
make it #30.
Yeah, good idea.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
http://www.tkachenko.com/blog
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
-
Victor Mote wrote:
Well, I like the idea of inkstand and feather also. What about combining
it with another logo?
Sure. What did you have in mind?
I don't know, just combine inkstand and feather with another style-appropriate
logo, which consists of letters only.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
http://www.
As the modified logo is so popular, we should probably include it in the
list for voting, and let those who like it change their vote. Let's
make it #30.
Peter
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Victor, since one of my choices was also #7 with a dislike of the
font i decided to post a
I quite like #10 , but without the XML in the background!
_
Chat online in real time with MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
I can't recall if the first winnowing round was for 3 or 4 picks, and
I never noticed whether non-committers were even eligible to vote.
So anyway, here's my $0.02
For round I nominate:
7, 10, 21 and/or 22
13 (maybe w/out the dot - I also think of visine)
Many congratula
I too like the re-tooled #7 by Scott Hofman. However, I am leaning
toward a lowercase "fop" for the logo (as in #10). I like the feeling I
get from the serif of the f and the p. I also like the circular "o" in
#13 (although the red dot reminds me I need to use visine...)
My non-vote in order of
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
> Well, I like the idea of inkstand and feather also. What about combining
> it with another logo?
Sure. What did you have in mind?
Victor Mote
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
I was unable to load Adobe SVG Viewer 3.0. But Adobe SVG v2.0 is another
story! I downloaded the archived SVG Viewer 2.0 found here:
http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/old.html
After downloading and running the installer, I copied NPSVGvw.dll,
SVGView.dll and SVGViewer.zip to my Mozilla
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Victor, since one of my choices was also #7 with a dislike of the
font i decided to post a revised version.
Oooh. I like that a lot. Definitely my favorite. Thanks for submitting
that.
Me too!
Well, I like the idea of inkstand and feather also. What about combining
it wi
Victor Mote wrote:
Victor, since one of my choices was also #7 with a dislike of the
font i decided to post a revised version.
Oooh. I like that a lot. Definitely my favorite. Thanks for submitting that.
Me too!
J.Pietschmann
-
Clay Leeds wrote:
I am unable to find those files on my hard drive. I've downloaded Adobe
SVG Viewer 3.0
My SVGViewer identifies itself as
Version 2.0 (Build 55, 03/14/01)
You'd better ask on a Mozilla related forum for further help.
J.Pietschmann
---
Scott Hofmann wrote:
> Victor, since one of my choices was also #7 with a dislike of the
> font i decided to post a revised version.
Oooh. I like that a lot. Definitely my favorite. Thanks for submitting that.
Victor Mote
-
To
s to the plugins directory, but Mozilla
crashes as soon as an SVG page is loaded (the FOP logo contest page or
the Adobe SVG Demo page). I've also tried it with just NPSVG3.dll,
SVGCore.dll and SVGViewer.dict.
--
Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata
Peter B. West wrote:
Let's choose from the submissions, and if there is a consensus that some
tweaking is required, we can go back to the designer with a request for
a change.
Here is my favourite three:
#2 (I like the parrot idea, but sure it should be tweaked)
#21/22 (a little bit minimalistic
Fopdevs,
Let's choose from the submissions, and if there is a consensus that some
tweaking is required, we can go back to the designer with a request for
a change.
Peter
Scott Hofmann wrote:
Victor, since one of my choices was also #7 with a dislike of the font i
decided to post a revised ver
My favourites
#24
#15
#16
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Victor, since one of my choices was also #7 with a dislike of the
font i decided to post a revised version.
-Scott
At 1:58 PM -0700 3/14/03, Victor Mote wrote:
If the question is how the winner should be picked, I don't know. As far as
the logo itself goes, here are my favorites (in order):
1. #
Here are my comments regarding the proposed FOP logo designs.
Number correspond to logos at
http://vote.sparklit.com/web_poll.spark/714566_ :
1. ready for a change
2. Is attractive but does not say much to me about FOP
3. Too symbolic of the ANT project
4. nice - Clean like the use of transparenc
Peter B. West wrote:
This will have to wait until Joerg gets back from London.
Ok, my favorites:
#7, although I'd like it much more with a more classic typeface
(a serif font, or even Fractur).
#10 nice and clean
#2 the foparrot :-)
J.Pietschmann
-
Clay Leeds wrote:
As a side note, does anyone know how to get SVG to display in Mozilla
(1.3b). I tried installing the SVG plugin, but I can't get it to work.
Works with 1.2.1: copy NPSVGvw.dll, SVGView.dll and SVGViewer.zip into
the Mozilla plugins folder and restart. There's still the license sc
I continually have problems viewing SVG in Mozilla. I can see it OK in
M$IE but I hate using it. What would it take to create JPG versions of
the SVG submissions?
I definitely think that a requirement for the logo is an SVG
version (scalability, blah blah...), but shouldn't we have the LOGO
su
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
This will have to wait until Joerg gets back from London.
...and until a SVG viewer is up and running :-/
Have you tried Squiggle (Batik's SVG viewer) ?
You just have to copy&paste the URLs from the HTML source.
Christian
-
Peter B. West wrote:
Let's do some elimination rounds. Everyone pick a small number of
favourites, say 3. Eliminate anything that doesn't get 2 votes. Do the
same, specifying 2 favourites. Eliminate. Then vote for 1 logo. Most
votes wins. In the event of a tie, there's a run-off for the w
Peter B. West wrote:
This will have to wait until Joerg gets back from London.
...and until a SVG viewer is up and running :-/
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PRO
Peter B. West wrote:
Let's do some elimination rounds. Everyone pick a small number of
favourites, say 3. Eliminate anything that doesn't get 2 votes. Do the
same, specifying 2 favourites. Eliminate. Then vote for 1 logo. Most
votes wins. In the event of a tie, there's a run-off for the w
Let's do some elimination rounds. Everyone pick a small number of
favourites, say 3. Eliminate anything that doesn't get 2 votes. Do the
same, specifying 2 favourites. Eliminate. Then vote for 1 logo. Most
votes wins. In the event of a tie, there's a run-off for the winner.
This will hav
FWIW I've played a bit with Chuck White's logo and here's the results:
http://cvs.apache.org/~jeremias/fop2-by-Chuck-White-modified.pdf
The logo on the web poll looks huge and bulky compared to others, but
when looked at from a distance, it looks even better.
Does that sound like I like this desi
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
> So, we've got 28 logos [1] submitted. Now lets pick out the
> winner somehow.
> Comments?
If the question is how the winner should be picked, I don't know. As far as
the logo itself goes, here are my favorites (in order):
1. #7 (Tobias Muller, fountain pen feather). This
Of the others, the ones I like best by far are those of Anders
Sonnergren, especially the first, in spite of the fact that the 'p' is
rotated 90deg. I like the font, the stylisation of the Apache feather
(which is atrocious in this context) and the overall elegance.
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL PRO
On 13.03.2003 19:28:17 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I also like the one from Lars Vallin with the red dot in the "o" (#13).
> But somehow I've got the impression that I've seen this design already
> somewhere. But I can't hit home, yet.
Here's another little comment. Don't take it seriously, please.
]Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com> cc:
Assunto: logo contest
I like Clare Cowley's. I'm sure it doesn't scale, and I'm sure the
colors will be a problem, and it's a bit scruffy, but it has energy and
it doesn't look as though it were generated on a computer. But then I'm
the one who asked her to submit something.
I have the same problem with Mozilla.
Le Jeudi, 13 mars 2003, à 19:10 Europe/Zurich, Oleg Tkachenko a écrit :
So, we've got 28 logos [1] submitted. Now lets pick out the winner
somehow.
Comments?
My favorite by far is #13 By Lars Wallin.
IMHO it is the one that looks the most professional, and it is clean
and very readable.
-Bertran
I like Andy Joslin's #21 & #22 for some of the same reasons Jeremias
likes Chuck White's (FO P). I also like Andy Joslin's because they are
SVG and the colors are relatively easy to adjust to match the document
design (this could be bad, too!). Machael Schnuerle's are fun as well.
His integrati
Oleg,
I just voted and noticed that there're already a bunch of votes. Perhaps
it would be good to clear all of the votes and have everyone vote--now
that all of the submissions have been made.
BTW, I see a _bunch_ of very nice logos here! It'll be a tough choice,
and I'm sure it'll be neck &
My favourite is the green design by Chuck White (#9) most. Reasons:
- It emphasizes on "FO" be playing with the color, showing that FOP is
not a "Fop", but a "FO" "P", an FO processor.
- I like the pencil that is nicely integrated with the logo. Very nice
idea.
- The logo scales well and has go
Hello!
So, we've got 28 logos [1] submitted. Now lets pick out the winner somehow.
Comments?
[1] http://vote.sparklit.com/web_poll.spark/714566
--
Oleg Tkachenko
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
Hello!
New FOP is looming and it needs a new logo. FOP Team announces open logo
contest and invites all members of the FOP community as well as any other
interested parties to participate as contestants or by expressing your opinion
through voting.
The rules and details are at http
46 matches
Mail list logo
