Re: getPageCount and FOP 1.0dev

2005-07-30 Thread Manuel Mall
I think I have a handle on how to obtain the number of pages generated per page sequence. However, I am struggling with how to best access the FormattingResults structure in Fop.java. In 0.20.5 the structure lived in StreamRenderer which is now sort of AreaTreeHandler. It is not clear to me how

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35918] - [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Element list generation for tables (special case)

2005-07-30 Thread Jeremias Maerki
D'oh, right. :-) Lucky me. Too bad, we don't generate validation warnings for misplaced non-inherited properties. Didn't we have that discussion already this year? I can't find it or am I imagining it? On 30.07.2005 03:47:45 Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Jul 28, 2005, at 14:04, Jeremias Maerki

Re: Element list generation for tables (special case)

2005-07-30 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 29, 2005, at 23:25, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Strike that. Just found a mean case where my quick hack breaks. Back to frame one and a half. It's going to be a bit more difficult. FWIW: It occurred to me that, with a break-before=page on the

Re: Element list generation for tables (special case)

2005-07-30 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:40:25PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: But I get the impression that this avoids the topic I raised. :-) I think this here is not about whether these special break conditions are favored or avoided but if they should be allowed at all. OK. Yes, the rule you propose

Re: Element list generation for tables (special case)

2005-07-30 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:40:25PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I was under the impression that the breaker automatically favors break decisions that take up less space. It even goes so far that if you have a minimum=0pt and an optimum=2opt on a space-before, that it currently chooses 0pt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35937] New: - [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35937] - [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35937] - [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35937] - [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Element list generation for tables (special case)

2005-07-30 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 30, 2005, at 11:51, Jeremias Maerki wrote: D'oh, right. :-) Lucky me. Too bad, we don't generate validation warnings for misplaced non-inherited properties. Didn't we have that discussion already this year? I can't find it or am I imagining

RE: getPageCount and FOP 1.0dev

2005-07-30 Thread Manuel Mall
As this is now done anything else I can help with (keep it small to start with please)? Manuel

Re: Element list generation for tables (special case)

2005-07-30 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 30.07.2005 13:07:40 Andreas L Delmelle wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 29, 2005, at 23:25, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Strike that. Just found a mean case where my quick hack breaks. Back to frame one and a half. It's going to be a bit more difficult. FWIW:

Re: Element list generation for tables (special case)

2005-07-30 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks for looking it up. I've put it on the todo list on the Wiki so it doesn't get forgotten. It's low priority anyway. It's probably a good exercise for someone who wants to get into how the FO tree works. On 30.07.2005 15:14:04 Andreas L Delmelle wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: getPageCount and FOP 1.0dev

2005-07-30 Thread Jeremias Maerki
You're making me happy, Manuel! May I point you to the task list on the Wiki? http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FOPProjectTasks I think there are lots of small things that you can easily jump into. Absolutely great would be if you tried to prepare the compliance page to receive additional

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35939] New: - [PATCH] Port of 0.20.5 Driver.java class

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35939. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] New: - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: getPageCount and FOP 1.0dev

2005-07-30 Thread Manuel Mall
Managed to install Forrest 0.7 and installed and built the xmlgraphics site from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/site/. However, I am a bit confused about how this hangs together as there are two sites related to fop: xmlgraphics.apache.org and xml.apache.org/fop. So I can build

Re: getPageCount and FOP 1.0dev

2005-07-30 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ignore the XML Graphics site. Just run Forrest from the root directory where you checked out FOP. FOP's site is in its own repo, not in the site repo from XML Graphics. On 30.07.2005 18:38:55 Manuel Mall wrote: Managed to install Forrest 0.7 and installed and built the xmlgraphics site from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35918] - [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35948] New: - pre-patch for FOrayFont adaptation to Fop

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35948] - pre-patch for FOrayFont adaptation to Fop

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35948] - pre-patch for FOrayFont adaptation to Fop

2005-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

offline

2005-07-30 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi all, I'll be offline during 3 weeks: summer holidays, far from computers ;-) My work on the font subsystem is getting along, a bit slowly those last days but I hope to have more time after holidays. Currently I'm on the pdf part: it's a bit difficult because font and pdf things are very