[Bug 40676] [PATCH] png graphics are expanded/uncompressed in pdf causing massive file size increase

2012-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40676 --- Comment #15 from Glenn Adams --- (In reply to comment #13) > Wiki updated: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/HowTo/ImageLoaderRawPNG you may also want to update [1] and [2] [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/graphics.htm

[Bug 40676] [PATCH] png graphics are expanded/uncompressed in pdf causing massive file size increase

2012-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40676 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Clay Leeds
I was going to say that Pascal had a good point, and that it was really up to Glenn. +1 from me "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet On Jun 15, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > Ok, > then... > +1 for me > > 2012/6/15 Glenn Adams : >> If Vinc

[Bug 40676] [PATCH] png graphics are expanded/uncompressed in pdf causing massive file size increase

2012-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40676 --- Comment #13 from Luis Bernardo --- Wiki updated: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/HowTo/ImageLoaderRawPNG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Pascal Sancho
Ok, then... +1 for me 2012/6/15 Glenn Adams : > If Vincent would like this in the 1.1 release, then I'm in favor of a merge > to trunk. So I'd say +1. > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Pascal Sancho > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Glenn Adams
If Vincent would like this in the 1.1 release, then I'm in favor of a merge to trunk. So I'd say +1. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > Hi, > > Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure > it's time to merge such branch to trunk. > I guess this new fe

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2012-06-15 Thread Glenn Adams
It looks like my update to XGC didn't get completely propagated. I'm heading to airport now, so won't be able to look at this until later today. FWIW, my local build is working, so I've got to look deeper. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This

[Bug 40676] [PATCH] png graphics are expanded/uncompressed in pdf causing massive file size increase

2012-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40676 --- Comment #12 from Luis Bernardo --- Created attachment 28944 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28944&action=edit patch for findbugs fixes/ignores findbugs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the as

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Pascal Sancho
Hi, Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure it's time to merge such branch to trunk. I guess this new feature will not be part of the 1.1 release. If merging have to be done quickly, then we should create a 1.1 maintenance branch to ensure that merging will not affect

[VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Vincent Hennebert
As you may have noticed, I’ve recently spent some time updating the Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch to the latest trunk and doing some clean-up (thanks to Robert for updating the testcases to JUnit 4). We have been using the code from this branch for quite a while now and it has proven to work re

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affec

[Bug 53412] [PATCH] o.a.f.fo.properties.CondLengthProperty.equals() uses object identity

2012-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53412 Alex Giotis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 51843] Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

2012-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51843 --- Comment #27 from C.C --- Same problem here! Do you guys can provide me any work around before the bug is fixed? you know, it takes time to seek a suitable fonts to fit. Anyway, will keep an eye on the thread. Cusson -- You are receiv