On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I agree, but as Simon pointed out PDFBox is not a dependency of FOP, but
of PDF plug-in, which is a separate project with a separate release cycle.
The PDF plug-in project is an optional dependency of FOP, not
I think that maven will be embraced as soon as there is a volunteer to
do the transition.
On 4/22/15 6:13 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com mailto:bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com wrote:
I agree, but as Simon pointed out
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Luis Bernardo lmpmberna...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think that maven will be embraced as soon as there is a volunteer to do
the transition.
A few years ago I went through the process of creating a full maven
configuration for FOP; however, the group was not ready
I agree, but as Simon pointed out PDFBox is not a dependency of FOP, but
of PDF plug-in, which is a separate project with a separate release
cycle. The PDF plug-in project is an optional dependency of FOP, not
required for core functionality.
So the proposal is just to release the FOP
Maybe I only spoke for myself, but I am in: +1
From what I understand publishing the source jars to maven central
would be automatic then, since there is some plugin for that. Given the
fact that I have spent many hours adapting the Batik ant file to produce
the source jars for maven central
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Luis Bernardo lmpmberna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe I only spoke for myself, but I am in: +1
From what I understand publishing the source jars to maven central would
be automatic then, since there is some plugin for that. Given the fact that
I have spent many
Hi Glen,
Its expected that a -1 vote includes a justification. You may well be
right, but we are not mind readers and have no idea what you are thinking...
Thanks,
Chris
On 21/04/2015 16:32, Glenn Adams wrote:
-1
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Simon Steiner
simonsteiner1...@gmail.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14506533#comment-14506533
]
John Cumming commented on FOP-2460:
---
We have also had problems with several other OTF
When I suggested releasing Batik back in December, Glenn mentioned that
he wanted to fix some issues (namely
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2391) before releasing FOP
2.0. I assume this is the reason for -1, but I agree that a
justification would help since not everyone may
