https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #19 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
I can tell already that you aren't using the trunk version, since you should
not get 1.0beta2.
Please do the following (or equivalent) from the root level of what you
think is the current
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #20 from Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
fop -version
FOP Version 1.0beta2
There was never been such FOP version between 0.95 final and 1.0 final.
The branch 1.0 was used only to prepare the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #22 from Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #21)
However, i tried executing following command.
C:\svn tempspace\fop svn\buildjava -cp fop.jar org.apache.fop.cli.Main
-version
It return:
FOP
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #23 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #21)
It return:
FOP Version 1.0beta2
It return:
FOP Version svn-trunk
It is clear you have a local configuration issue to figure out and fix. Your
tests
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #24 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
(In reply to comment #23)
(In reply to comment #21)
It return:
FOP Version 1.0beta2
It return:
FOP Version svn-trunk
It is clear you have a local configuration issue to figure out and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #14 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #6)
The first 3 lines of generated PDF from you give a near correct look.
The problem is at character
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #15 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #6)
The first 3 lines of generated PDF from you give a near correct look.
The problem
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #16 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #6)
The first 3 lines of generated PDF from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #17 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 29102
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29102action=edit
The debug mode output from fop.bat
The result of using fop.bat execution is the same as
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #18 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Created attachment 29102 [details]
The debug mode output from fop.bat
The result of using fop.bat execution is the same as previously upload PDF
file.
I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #6 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
The first 3 lines of generated PDF from you give a near correct look.
The problem is at character 26, Mai-Ek.
It ship too far to the left.
I have few questions regarding to your output.
I changed my
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #7 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 29094
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29094action=edit
the xml data used to reproduce a problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #8 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 29095
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29095action=edit
the xslt which transform thaidata.xml into fo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #9 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 29096
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29096action=edit
The generated PDF file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
na...@th.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29095|application/octet-stream|text/xml
mime type|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #10 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #6)
The first 3 lines of generated PDF from you give a near correct look.
The problem is at character 26, Mai-Ek.
It ship too far to the left.
I understand. I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #11 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Created attachment 29095 [details]
the xslt which transform thaidata.xml into fo
Please provide an FO input file. I don't care about XSLT/XML files (they are
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #12 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 29097
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29097action=edit
FO file for reproduce the problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #13 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #6)
The first 3 lines of generated PDF from you give a near correct look.
The problem is at character 26, Mai-Ek.
It ship too far to the left.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #2 from na...@th.ibm.com ---
Thanks for the promptly reply.
Yes, i have tested with FOP 1.0 and it product exactly the same as the first
line of the picture i attached.
There are few Thai fonts that aren't using GSUB and GPOS.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53577, 53578
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #4 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
Created attachment 29090
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29090action=edit
test FO file showing gsub/gpos application
This FO shows the same data with Angsana
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
Created attachment 29091
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29091action=edit
test PDF file showing gsub/gpos application
This file shows the output using
25 matches
Mail list logo
