Re: Do we have Area Tree construction also via getNextKnuthElements methods or mostly via addAreas?

2006-10-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I doubt anyone currently has much time to write such documentation. Yes, the design document on the web is outdated and the Wiki does not contain an overview of the whole layout engine. That's not so good but reflects how many resources we have for this project. It requires that we set our

Re: Do we have Area Tree construction also via getNextKnuthElements methods or mostly via addAreas?

2006-10-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Well, given that I wrote most of the new table layout code I'd be the one who knows exactly how it works (or at least I'm supposed to know). Anyway, at the moment I don't know what exactly I can contribute to get Andrejus better on his way. For getting the auto table layout feature right, you

RE: Do we have Area Tree construction also via getNextKnuthElements methods or mostly via addAreas?

2006-10-07 Thread Andrejus Chaliapinas
Andrejus, I think it's best if you read all the threads here on fop-dev on auto table layout during August if have not already done so. They contain a lot of information about the next steps for the auto table layout and what has been discussed so far. Ok, thank you for pointing to right

Re: Do we have Area Tree construction also via getNextKnuthElements methods or mostly via addAreas?

2006-10-05 Thread Tomas Studva
J.Pietschmann wrote: Simon Pepping wrote: No UML diagrams for FOP available. Would be nice though. As soon as I get some spare time, I'll try http://sourceforge.net/projects/umldot I suspect the diagrams to be somewhat unwieldy. J.Pietschmann I think that is not good choice for genetaring

RE: Do we have Area Tree construction also via getNextKnuthElements methods or mostly via addAreas?

2006-10-05 Thread Andrejus Chaliapinas
J.Pietschmann wrote: Simon Pepping wrote: No UML diagrams for FOP available. Would be nice though. As soon as I get some spare time, I'll try http://sourceforge.net/projects/umldot I suspect the diagrams to be somewhat unwieldy. J.Pietschmann I think that is not good choice

Re: Do we have Area Tree construction also via getNextKnuthElements methods or mostly via addAreas?

2006-10-05 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:18:22PM +0300, Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote: But that still doesn't answer the question - if there are some Knuth elements constructed - what is the best way to debug current Area Tree, which contains them? And if there any mechanism to protect particular Area Tree

Re: Do we have Area Tree construction also via getNextKnuthElements methods or mostly via addAreas?

2006-10-04 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:59:07PM +0300, Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote: Hi, I'm trying to understand why in Patrick's code, when he deals with Table auto layout feature, after TableContentLayoutManager over current TableLayoutManager is prepared and processed with required columns

Re: Do we have Area Tree construction also via getNextKnuthElements methods or mostly via addAreas?

2006-10-04 Thread J.Pietschmann
Simon Pepping wrote: No UML diagrams for FOP available. Would be nice though. As soon as I get some spare time, I'll try http://sourceforge.net/projects/umldot I suspect the diagrams to be somewhat unwieldy. J.Pietschmann