:03 +0100
From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
Hi Vincent,
On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images,
instead of trying
Hi Vincent,
On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images,
instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the
system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output.
Please note that this
+1
I think this sounds ok based on what Luis is saying.
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:25:03 +0100
From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
Hi Vincent,
On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote
is saying.
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:25:03 +0100
From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
Hi Vincent,
On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
This work allows to directly use FOP
Hi,
from [1], I understand that the BATIK patch is not yet applied on BATIK
trunk, so introducing a such dependency is not a good idea for the moment.
I will vote +1 when the patch will be applied.
For now, we depend on Batik team
[1]
This looks like a great and important step. Nice work Vincent!
I have similar concerns as Pancho, so when the BATIK patch is applied I'll vote
+1.
Regards,
Clay
Clay Leeds # 949-510-8993 @ the.webmaes...@gmail.com
On Aug 21, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Since currently fop depends on a batik milestone release, not on trunk
(except for the gump build), I see no problem replacing the current
batik jar in the lib directory by a patched one. Note that the gump
descriptor will need to be updated if the batik jar in fop is updated
before the
