Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-09-08 Thread Jeremias Maerki
+1! On 08.09.2010 13:02:29 Vincent Hennebert wrote: Ok, let me summarise this: • a @[asf.]todo tag marginally improves the formatting of a javadoc comment • nobody really likes the idea of using a namespaced version of todo (@asf.todo) • it is possible to tweak Checkstyle

RE: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-09-08 Thread Eric Douglas
the developing programmer is planning to do next. I think taking the @ off the TODO makes sense. -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:d...@jeremias-maerki.ch] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:19 AM To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit

Re: TODO tag

2010-09-08 Thread Glenn Adams
this: ??? a @[asf.]todo tag marginally improves the formatting of a javadoc comment ??? nobody really likes the idea of using a namespaced version of todo (@asf.todo) ??? it is possible to tweak Checkstyle and the javadoc command to enable the use of @todo That said: ??? todo

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-09-02 Thread Glenn Adams
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Jeremias Maerki d...@jeremias-maerki.chwrote: I'm not sure we have the tooling to make sure noone uses @todo. Actually, checkstyle 5.1 will report warnings for any use of a non-standard tag that is not qualified with a dotted prefix. Also the standard Doclet in

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-09-02 Thread J.Pietschmann
On 02.09.2010 12:14, Glenn Adams wrote: also the doclet options to permit use of @todo without warnings. I could try to experiment some to see if that is feasible, then we could return to the former usage of @todo. Javadoc 1.5 or later can be passed a command line option defining additional

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-08-31 Thread Vincent Hennebert
and then make the change. @asf.todo is specific enough that we could have changed it at any time. That said, Glenn's change was also made without a discussion. My javadoc does not complain about the @todo tag, and I had not understood that this was a motivation. The javadoc documentation (of my sun

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-08-31 Thread Glenn Adams
not complain about the @todo tag, and I had not understood that this was a motivation. The javadoc documentation (of my sun-java6-jdk) is not clear about this topic, and uses @todo liberally in its section about the -tag option. Its most informative paragraph is this: Avoiding Conflicts

TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline/ la

2010-08-28 Thread Simon Pepping
It would indeed have been better to first have a discussion and then make the change. @asf.todo is specific enough that we could have changed it at any time. That said, Glenn's change was also made without a discussion. My javadoc does not complain about the @todo tag, and I had not understood