+1!

On 08.09.2010 13:02:29 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Ok, let me summarise this:
> 
> • a @[asf.]todo tag marginally improves the formatting of a javadoc
>   comment
> • nobody really likes the idea of using a namespaced version of todo
>   (@asf.todo)
> • it is possible to tweak Checkstyle and the javadoc command to enable
>   the use of @todo
> 
> That said:
> • todo statements generally have little to do (sic) in a javadoc comment
>   anyway
> • TODO keywords are easily indexable by modern IDEs
> 
> Jeremias recommends the Felix way: using //TODO comments below the
> javadoc. I’m also strongly in favour of this convention. OTOH, if I’m
> correct nobody strongly feels that @todo tags are necessary.
> 
> So I think we have a consensus:
> • from now on we stop using @todo in favour of the Felix convention;
> • we will progressively remove TODO statements from javadoc comments and
>   move them below in their own Java // comments
> • I remove the definition of the custom tag from build.xml
> 
> Let me know if I missed anything.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vincent
<snip/> 



Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to