Hi Tony,
Tony Graham wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21 2009 23:30:17 +0100, jonathan.levin...@intersystems.com wrote:
...
If inherit is allowed to be a value then the grammar truly becomes ambiguous
since each of these can have the value inherit and we don?t know which ones
are
omitted and must take
On 23/09/2009, at 8:18 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Tony,
Tony Graham wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21 2009 23:30:17 +0100, jonathan.levin...@intersystems.com
wrote:
...
If inherit is allowed to be a value then the grammar truly becomes
ambiguous
since each of these can have the value inherit
Hi,
Also, in your message you said we could ignore a value for font of
caption, icon, etc., as the standard tells us to do, but the standard
discusses these values and their relation to system fonts. Was this
an oversight on your part or am I mis-reading the spec? [1]
[1]
Hi,
I think it is probably the case that in the context of the font short
hand – the font properties cannot take the value of inherit, since
this renders the grammar irreducibly ambiguous. While such an
exclusion is not mentioned in the spec, it makes sense that inherit
must be excluded
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
Hi Vincent,
As I read the grammar for the font shorthand it is ambiguous, though not
fatally so as long as one excludes the value of inherit from
individual properties in the font short hand.
For instance the first optional argument is
Message-
From: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:vhenneb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 7:20 AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: ambiguity of grammar for font shorthand?
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
Hi Vincent,
As I read the grammar for the font
On 23/09/2009, at 12:13 AM, Jonathan Levinson wrote:
Hi Vincent,
You make excellent points, however for font-style, font-variant and
font-weight the initial value (the default value) is normal, not
inherit.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice7.html#font-style
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
Hi Vincent,
You make excellent points, however for font-style, font-variant and
font-weight the initial value (the default value) is normal, not inherit.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice7.html#font-style
On Mon, Sep 21 2009 23:30:17 +0100, jonathan.levin...@intersystems.com wrote:
...
If inherit is allowed to be a value then the grammar truly becomes ambiguous
since each of these can have the value inherit and we don?t know which ones
are
omitted and must take the value normal.
'inherit'
Hi Vincent,
As I read the grammar for the font shorthand it is ambiguous, though not
fatally so as long as one excludes the value of inherit from
individual properties in the font short hand.
For instance the first optional argument is font-style, font-weight,
and font-variant, each of
10 matches
Mail list logo
