On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:33 am, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:07 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Hi all,
snip/
* The first step I took was moving much of the logic that is
currently in CollapsingBorderModelEyeCatching (in the layout
package) to CommonBorderPaddingBackground.
On Aug 28, 2005, at 04:33, Manuel Mall wrote:
I must admit I know very little about collapsing borders. Therefore if
my comment is useless just ignore it.
Well, I certainly don't think it's useless...
I have recently worked on all this percentage stuff. This applies
also
to border-width
On Aug 28, 2005, at 14:38, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Aug 28, 2005, at 00:06, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
AFAIK you're trying to move the pre-resolvable pieces into the FO
tree while you only do the
specialities in the LMs, right?
Exactly. Come to think of it, maybe that last idea won't be
On Aug 28, 2005, at 15:57, Manuel Mall wrote:
This is just a clarification question to those in the know.
In HTML when specifying a table browsers usually choose the smallest
width without causing unforced breaks in columns. That is in XSL-FO
terms the ipd of the table can be smaller than the
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
(It's probably best to collapse Development and Design into one tab.
Too many tabs are not ideal.
I second that.
J.Pietschmann
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On Aug 28, 2005, at 16:21, Manuel Mall wrote:
[Me:]
We could either:
- drop the table completely (+ warn about this, of course)
- explicitly notify the user that, because auto-layout is not
supported, the default value of auto is ignored and replaced by
100%
I second that for the time being.
