DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37828] - span=all produces incorrect page breaks when block contains a large amount of text

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37828. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Multi-columns documents: Column balancing

Bug 37828 showed me some deficiencies in the current column balancing approach. It definitely needs some work. So far, I tried to solve it by supplying a special computeDemerits() method. But currently it only looks at the KnuthNode being passed in. That's probably not good enough. Does anybody

Re: System.err System.out

Hi Jeremias You sound as if using a System.out/err is a sacrilege. sorry, you're right - I should have checked the code whether the System.err/out make sense where left. Let me get back to you on that Thanks Nils

FOP 0.90 Feedback

I noticed 0.90 and the request for feedback. Just a small nugget of point feedback: For my own usage, FOP's applicability and usefulness will not change from that of 0.20.5 until auto table layout is implemented. I note that in the 0.90 release notes that it is not yet implemented,

Re: FOP 0.90 Feedback

Funny coincidence. I just issued another request for feedback on fop-users. Thanks for yours! It's understandable that auto table layout is a big desire. Not only for those who want to create reports from database queries but also for those who want to convert (X)HTML to PDF. I personally believe

Re: FOP 0.90 Feedback

One other bit of feedback: Few other pieces of software appear to use Avalon. It's not a big deal, but using JCL might be a bit more consistent with other libraries folk are using (i.e. within a server environment). Jess Holle wrote: I noticed 0.90 and the request for feedback. Just a

more feedback on 0.90alpha

Hello: Here is some more feedback from a long time FOP user. I am ABSOLUTELY THRILLED by the new release. I have used it to create a number of PDF documents from Docbook/XML sources and the results are excellent!Thanks a million for this. While I don't agree that lack of automated table

Re: more feedback on 0.90alpha

Craeg Strong wrote: Hello: Here is some more feedback from a long time FOP user. I am ABSOLUTELY THRILLED by the new release. I have used it to create a number of PDF documents from Docbook/XML sources and the results are excellent!Thanks a million for this. While I don't agree that

Re: more feedback on 0.90alpha

Thanks a lot, Craeg. Maybe I should take some time during the weekend and write down my ideas on auto table layout on the Wiki [1]. Maybe with such an initial spark someone might finally sit down and take it on. I can imagine the layout engine might look daunting at first. With a few notes this

Re: FOP 0.90 Feedback

As I said, this is not nearly so important as automatic table layout, but it is a very important feature for tables of numeric (e.g. financial, inventory, or scientific) data -- whether or not the table is layed out automatically. -- Jess Holle Jeremias Maerki wrote: Hey, you're right.

Re: more feedback on 0.90alpha

On 08.12.2005 17:49:49 Jess Holle wrote: snip/ Does FOP 0.90 do good text wrapping in table cells? It should. The code is the same as everywhere else. snip/ Jeremias Maerki