DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38946] - [PATCH] for color Handling
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 07:30 --- Patch applied. Thanks a lot. The additional changes to the patch due to the changes since patch submission were no problem. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=399185view=rev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38243] - [patch] gaps in table-columns crash fop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38243. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 08:33 --- Applied. Thanks. Sorry for the delay. This seems to have slipped through the cracks. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399200view=rev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39422] - [PATCH] Fop fails to render non-ascii characters in PDF output
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39422. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39422 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||PatchAvailable Summary|Fop fails to render non-|[PATCH] Fop fails to render |ascii characters in PDF |non-ascii characters in PDF |output |output -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP
Dear Max, results of our work (not the latest one, but still good enough for publishing) is available from cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/jeuclid. Now I'm waiting for feedback from anyone of Apache FOP members on review the JEuclid code. At the moment, I have no idea whether some work has been done in this regard. Present status of our work (we still performing some regression tests, but its 99% already done) is the following: - we have merged JEuclid with FOP 0.20.5 (version available under sf.net is based on one of the pre 0.20.4). - we remove all references to AWT library, so now JEuclid is able to work on screenless servers without XWindows configuration. - support badly fonts (e.g. Arial Unicode MS, which we are enforced to use for MathML rendering). Due to last two issues we extended metric files with extended information about symbol location within the glyph. Plans for merging into 0.90 and later are not exists so far because we do have to improve the following functionality of the FOP itself to satisfy our needs (these features are done by us for FOP 0.20.5). 1. Support of embedded PDF's using itext library. 2. Support of the specific logging into files without any use of console (from my point of view, this is absolutely dummy requirement and we can use log4j, but I'm not in charge to modify it). 3. Support of Arial Unicode MS as TYPE1 font, and not as TYPE0 font. 4. Support of phantom attribute on page-sequence. To hide particular pages in PDF result file but take them into account in page numbering. 5. Support both JDK 1.3 and 1.4. This requires us to integrate support of SAXON parser for JDK 1.4 due to nasty bug in xalan shipped with JDK 1.4. However for JDK 1.3 we still have to keep support of xalan. 6. Improving text layout within the merged table cells for lists (I'guess that for FOP 0.90 it is not the issue anymore). 7. Implement specific DTD lookup algorithm (e.g. search for DTD not only in the XML location but also in current directory). From one hand we would like to have the JEuclid integrated into FOP ASAP, however, we cannot follow release schedule of the FOP due to very major changes of FOP due to features above. As far as I understood Jeremias, he recommended us wait until FOray will be integrated into main branch, but this work still not completed (or even canceled???). Concerning licensing issue. We have contacted the JEuclid original publishers and got their permission to re-publish JEuclid to the AFL license as required for FOP integration. Internally, from our side we got all the permissions to publish our work as well. We can commit all necessary statement as required by ASF once our work will be accepted for publication. Concerning your issues: - I would say this is good idea to include jeuclid into xmlgraphics. However, we need some FOP developers comments on the extended metric file. Otherwise, output will be useless in producing paper-ready PDF's. - We already doing that, however only for the TIFF format. This can be easily done by means of fo:external-graphics in the stylesheet (if I understood your work right). - This feature we are mostly interested in. At the moment this implemented by means of xsl:copy-of due to misinterpretation of character entities in xsl:copy implementation. You are absolutely free to re-use our results in any way under terms of AFL. Best regards, Gennadiy Saturday, April 29, 2006, 10:33:17 PM, you wrote: MB Dear Gennady, MB Dear developers, MB I've just recently played around with mathml and tried to include MB that in my fop documents. I've found several tools, and among others MB jeuclid. jeuclid is very complete, it is just missing a few adapter MB classes. I've written a small one to convert mml to svg and it works MB just fine. MB I've then found out that there was work done merging jeuclid into MB fop / xmlgraphics. What is the current status of this? What are the MB license / technical issues? Is this desired at all? MB Here is what I would like to see: MB - include jeuclid in xmlgraphics MB - add code to fop to support the inclusion of mml documents as MB external images. MB - add code to fop to support mml embedded within fo documents MB i would be willing to provide the first two items, if it is legal to MB do so... MB Max -- Best regards, Gennadiymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Google Summer of Code
It looks like you two need to sign up for the GSoC directly on the website and enter your application there based on the info on the ASF Wiki. This needs to be completed until May 8. After that the applications will be rated by the mentors. To me this was all a bit confusing despite the extensive FAQs. Realized only today that I have to sign up, too, as a mentor. http://code.google.com/ On 28.04.2006 17:24:43 Patrick Paul wrote: Same here, I've added an entry for auto table layout, right after Vincents. Patrick Vincent Hennebert wrote: Ok, I've added an entry for floats implementation. I'll be off-line from tomorrow until the 6th of may. Just hoping no particular problem will occur during my absence. Anyway, if I don't answer mails that's just normal. Vincent Jeremias Maerki a écrit : Yes, please add entries for the two projects. That Wiki page is the first station. I'm not sure, yet, who exactly will transfer the proposals to Google (can't remember from last year, either), but the first step is to identify the projects inside the ASF. I'll need to read through the whole mentoring info and stuff during the weekend. You can list me as a mentor on both projects. If I can get help from another FOP committer mentoring, all the better. On 27.04.2006 16:22:44 Patrick Paul wrote: Jeremias, Do you think we should have our two projects posted on the Apache Wiki ? http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2006 Is it better to go through that page, or will our proposals be forwarded directly to you anyway ? Thanks, Patrick Jeremias Maerki
Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP
I forgot to CC the jeuclid list when I replied to Max. Here's the link: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-dev/200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Just in case... The whole thing about bringing JEuclid into the XML Graphics project is not that simple. As I said before, this would be a new subproject which means that it would have to go through the Incubator and not only the IP clearance process. However, without a live community (at least 2 active developers) around the thing it has practically no chance to succeed. I have to clarify my position here: I'm not actively using MathML and that's why I don't have much time to help here. I'm willing to help faciliating a migration if the preconditions are met. The problem is that I don't see they are. JEuclid is not unlike Barcode4J (my baby) which is also not going to come here mostly because there's no live developer community there. Last fall, I was hoping that JEuclid may gain some new momentum, but as far as I can see the whole thing was a single commit to CVS in December and that was it. Please be aware that such a migration is A LOT OF WORK and takes considerable energy. The legal work alone is a project in itself. So, IMO you should work towards a JEuclid release from within the SourceForge project. JEuclid is better served that way. People interested in MathML should gather there and strengthen JEuclid from within first. FOP can still use JEuclid for MathML handling. What I can help with right now is to do a review of JEuclid and update the MathML extension for FOP Trunk. This extension can either live here in FOP or in JEuclid. I don't care so much. When the JEuclid release is available and the FOP extension updated we can bundle JEuclid with FOP as we've already decided last year. Same for Barcode4J, BTW. If there are strong voices from within the XML Graphics project to adopt JEuclid we can reevaluate but until then I don't see JEuclid coming to the ASF. As a prebuilt JAR under a compatible license, yes, but not as source code. On 03.05.2006 13:17:04 Gennadiy Tsarenkov wrote: Dear Max, results of our work (not the latest one, but still good enough for publishing) is available from cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/jeuclid. Now I'm waiting for feedback from anyone of Apache FOP members on review the JEuclid code. At the moment, I have no idea whether some work has been done in this regard. Present status of our work (we still performing some regression tests, but its 99% already done) is the following: - we have merged JEuclid with FOP 0.20.5 (version available under sf.net is based on one of the pre 0.20.4). - we remove all references to AWT library, so now JEuclid is able to work on screenless servers without XWindows configuration. - support badly fonts (e.g. Arial Unicode MS, which we are enforced to use for MathML rendering). Due to last two issues we extended metric files with extended information about symbol location within the glyph. Plans for merging into 0.90 and later are not exists so far because we do have to improve the following functionality of the FOP itself to satisfy our needs (these features are done by us for FOP 0.20.5). 1. Support of embedded PDF's using itext library. 2. Support of the specific logging into files without any use of console (from my point of view, this is absolutely dummy requirement and we can use log4j, but I'm not in charge to modify it). 3. Support of Arial Unicode MS as TYPE1 font, and not as TYPE0 font. 4. Support of phantom attribute on page-sequence. To hide particular pages in PDF result file but take them into account in page numbering. 5. Support both JDK 1.3 and 1.4. This requires us to integrate support of SAXON parser for JDK 1.4 due to nasty bug in xalan shipped with JDK 1.4. However for JDK 1.3 we still have to keep support of xalan. 6. Improving text layout within the merged table cells for lists (I'guess that for FOP 0.90 it is not the issue anymore). 7. Implement specific DTD lookup algorithm (e.g. search for DTD not only in the XML location but also in current directory). From one hand we would like to have the JEuclid integrated into FOP ASAP, however, we cannot follow release schedule of the FOP due to very major changes of FOP due to features above. As far as I understood Jeremias, he recommended us wait until FOray will be integrated into main branch, but this work still not completed (or even canceled???). Concerning licensing issue. We have contacted the JEuclid original publishers and got their permission to re-publish JEuclid to the AFL license as required for FOP integration. Internally, from our side we got all the permissions to publish our work as well. We can commit all necessary statement as required by ASF once our work will be accepted for publication. Concerning your issues: - I would say this is good idea to include jeuclid into xmlgraphics. However, we need some FOP developers
Re[2]: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP
Hello Jeremias, I'm not saying that this is simple, I'm just saying pre-conditions, when we would be able to continue invest our efforts into integration into FOP. You are absolutely right, saying that there should be interest of the public community to such a work. At present, we get first feedback/requests on our work after about 5 month of absolute silence. This basically means that there is no demand on this feature. Either peoples are using other solutions or they are simply want to have additional feature in a list which says MathML support without any real background for that. Moreover, what I've learned so far is that FOP is not trying to get publication ready PDF's (what is my case) rather then readable XML. Correct me, if I'm wrong. The reasons for rare commits is that on our side there is more then one developer working on the project. While we do not have any feedback, we do not update public repository and just using our private one. There is another weak reason, why I cannot made release on sourceforge.net. I have only CVS commit rights to the JEuclid project and cannot make any releases. My perception is that we will continue making half-year commits to the sf.net repository with patched FOP and JEuclid which fully covers our needs. If somebody would be interested for somebody to integrate into FOP thunk, s/he is welcome. -- Best regards, Gennadiymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 3:13:11 PM, you wrote: JM I forgot to CC the jeuclid list when I replied to Max. Here's the link: JM http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-dev/200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] JM Just in case... JM The whole thing about bringing JEuclid into the XML Graphics project is JM not that simple. As I said before, this would be a new subproject which JM means that it would have to go through the Incubator and not only the IP JM clearance process. However, without a live community (at least 2 active JM developers) around the thing it has practically no chance to succeed. I JM have to clarify my position here: I'm not actively using MathML and JM that's why I don't have much time to help here. I'm willing to help JM faciliating a migration if the preconditions are met. The problem is JM that I don't see they are. JEuclid is not unlike Barcode4J (my baby) JM which is also not going to come here mostly because there's no live JM developer community there. Last fall, I was hoping that JEuclid may gain JM some new momentum, but as far as I can see the whole thing was a single JM commit to CVS in December and that was it. Please be aware that such a JM migration is A LOT OF WORK and takes considerable energy. The legal work JM alone is a project in itself. JM So, IMO you should work towards a JEuclid release from within the JM SourceForge project. JEuclid is better served that way. People JM interested in MathML should gather there and strengthen JEuclid from JM within first. FOP can still use JEuclid for MathML handling. What I can JM help with right now is to do a review of JEuclid and update the MathML JM extension for FOP Trunk. This extension can either live here in FOP or JM in JEuclid. I don't care so much. When the JEuclid release is available JM and the FOP extension updated we can bundle JEuclid with FOP as we've JM already decided last year. Same for Barcode4J, BTW. JM If there are strong voices from within the XML Graphics project to adopt JM JEuclid we can reevaluate but until then I don't see JEuclid coming to JM the ASF. As a prebuilt JAR under a compatible license, yes, but not as JM source code. JM On 03.05.2006 13:17:04 Gennadiy Tsarenkov wrote: Dear Max, results of our work (not the latest one, but still good enough for publishing) is available from cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/jeuclid. Now I'm waiting for feedback from anyone of Apache FOP members on review the JEuclid code. At the moment, I have no idea whether some work has been done in this regard. Present status of our work (we still performing some regression tests, but its 99% already done) is the following: - we have merged JEuclid with FOP 0.20.5 (version available under sf.net is based on one of the pre 0.20.4). - we remove all references to AWT library, so now JEuclid is able to work on screenless servers without XWindows configuration. - support badly fonts (e.g. Arial Unicode MS, which we are enforced to use for MathML rendering). Due to last two issues we extended metric files with extended information about symbol location within the glyph. Plans for merging into 0.90 and later are not exists so far because we do have to improve the following functionality of the FOP itself to satisfy our needs (these features are done by us for FOP 0.20.5). 1. Support of embedded PDF's using itext library. 2. Support of the specific logging into files without any use of console (from my point of view,
Re: Google Summer of Code
Hi Jeremias, I have submitted an application. Indeed all this is unclear, I never realized mentors also had to signup. But I'm sure that with your reputation there won't be any problems ;-) In my application I mainly copied the content of the Wiki page. Should you have any comments or suggestions to improve my proposal please don't hesitate. I'm very excited about participating in the GSoC. I hope Apache Fop is considered an mportant enough project within the ASF because it seems that many other ASF projects are making proposals. Thank you, Patrick Jeremias Maerki wrote: It looks like you two need to sign up for the GSoC directly on the website and enter your application there based on the info on the ASF Wiki. This needs to be completed until May 8. After that the applications will be rated by the mentors. To me this was all a bit confusing despite the extensive FAQs. Realized only today that I have to sign up, too, as a mentor. http://code.google.com/ On 28.04.2006 17:24:43 Patrick Paul wrote: Same here, I've added an entry for auto table layout, right after Vincents. Patrick Vincent Hennebert wrote: Ok, I've added an entry for floats implementation. I'll be off-line from tomorrow until the 6th of may. Just hoping no particular problem will occur during my absence. Anyway, if I don't answer mails that's just normal. Vincent Jeremias Maerki a écrit : Yes, please add entries for the two projects. That Wiki page is the first station. I'm not sure, yet, who exactly will transfer the proposals to Google (can't remember from last year, either), but the first step is to identify the projects inside the ASF. I'll need to read through the whole mentoring info and stuff during the weekend. You can list me as a mentor on both projects. If I can get help from another FOP committer mentoring, all the better. On 27.04.2006 16:22:44 Patrick Paul wrote: Jeremias, Do you think we should have our two projects posted on the Apache Wiki ? http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2006 Is it better to go through that page, or will our proposals be forwarded directly to you anyway ? Thanks, Patrick Jeremias Maerki
Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP
Hi Gennadiy On 03.05.2006 16:14:41 Gennadiy Tsarenkov wrote: Hello Jeremias, I'm not saying that this is simple, I'm just saying pre-conditions, when we would be able to continue invest our efforts into integration into FOP. You are absolutely right, saying that there should be interest of the public community to such a work. At present, we get first feedback/requests on our work after about 5 month of absolute silence. This basically means that there is no demand on this feature. Either peoples are using other solutions or they are simply want to have additional feature in a list which says MathML support without any real background for that. Moreover, what I've learned so far is that FOP is not trying to get publication ready PDF's (what is my case) rather then readable XML. Correct me, if I'm wrong. It's probably more so that people from the business document side are more likely to invest in FOP than those from the publishing department do. But the good news is that one of my clients requests some level of PDF/X support which clearly goes in the direction of publication ready PDFs. The reasons for rare commits is that on our side there is more then one developer working on the project. While we do not have any feedback, we do not update public repository and just using our private one. There is another weak reason, why I cannot made release on sourceforge.net. I have only CVS commit rights to the JEuclid project and cannot make any releases. Then maybe you should see if you can get admin privileges because you'll exclude probably more than 80% of the possible users if you don't do releases. Some people are simply not into getting source code from CVS. The same applies to FOP, BTW, because the license policy dictates that we shall not use unreleased JARs in our releases. Which means we're basically stuck with JEuclid 2.0 for now. My perception is that we will continue making half-year commits to the sf.net repository with patched FOP and JEuclid which fully covers our needs. Not a very promising prospect. That's certainly not how you can attract possible users. If somebody would be interested for somebody to integrate into FOP thunk, s/he is welcome. I'll handle that. snip/ Jeremias Maerki
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38946] - [PATCH] for color Handling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremias, thank you very much! I'll continue to submit patches whenever I find something that I need. Max [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 07:30 --- Patch applied. Thanks a lot. The additional changes to the patch due to the changes since patch submission were no problem. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=399185view=rev -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEWO2SxVFyWbWycjQRAo6pAJoCIBhrroC/cDwGIXlX/cN15tY5TgCdElqv NBmSZpwMdi76XR+rmobb5Cg= =WR8n -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Gennadiy, thank you for your very extensive answer. At least now I know what the current status is. So for now I'll use jeuclid externally to convert so svg and then include that into fop. Gennadiy Tsarenkov wrote: The reasons for rare commits is that on our side there is more then one developer working on the project. While we do not have any feedback, we do not update public repository and just using our private one. There is another weak reason, why I cannot made release on sourceforge.net. I have only CVS commit rights to the JEuclid project and cannot make any releases. I would like to see your changes in the jeuclid cvs repository. I have some minor additions to jeuclid where I would like to provide patches for. Thanks Max -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEWO/ixVFyWbWycjQRAmzBAJ9Cd7gJYAHnv2yuaUPo9+LWSb6r6QCeJ5/6 0Qw2gAbx37i4V/ulQ0KrmSw= =KhMX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
