DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44920] New: nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44920 Summary: nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42703] fo:retrieve-marker misses fo: inline space character on first retrieve in page.

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42703 --- Comment #11 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 03:36:59 PST --- FWIW: I have this fixed again, locally. SVN commit is disabled, but as soon as it is enabled again, I'll commit the fix. For documentation

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 Luca Furini [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17432|0 |1 is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #16 from Luca Furini [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 08:07:37 PST --- I'm attaching an updated patch, that can be applied to the trunk as it is now. It basically does the same thing as the old one, just in a slightly

Re: svn commit: r652673 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: src/java/org/apache/fop/events/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/ test/fotree/testcas

2008-05-02 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On May 1, 2008, at 23:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adelmelle Date: Thu May 1 14:34:19 2008 New Revision: 652673 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=652673view=rev Log: First steps towards fo:retrieve-table-marker FWIW: I decided to finally look into this, as I've been noticing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #17 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 09:27:37 PST --- (In reply to comment #16) I'm attaching an updated patch, that can be applied to the trunk as it is now. Thanks! Good to see you back in action

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43474] wrap-option=wrap doesn't work

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43474 Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44920] nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44920 Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: svn commit: r652673 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: src/java/org/apache/fop/events/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/ test/fotree/testcas

2008-05-02 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Hi Andreas, I'm guessing by flaws and dirt you are referring to the broken junit test in FOTreeTestSuite due to fo:retrieve-table-marker being a child of fo:block in test/fotree/testcases/table_retrieve-table-marker.fo. Spec states: An fo:retrieve-table-marker is only permitted as the

Re: svn commit: r652673 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: src/java/org/apache/fop/events/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/ test/fotree/testcas

2008-05-02 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On May 2, 2008, at 18:47, Adrian Cumiskey wrote: I'm guessing by flaws and dirt you are referring to the broken junit test in FOTreeTestSuite due to fo:retrieve-table-marker being a child of fo:block in test/fotree/testcases/table_retrieve-table- marker.fo. Indeed. The reason is I forgot

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #18 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 10:21:09 PST --- Just ran the layoutengine test-suite after having applied the patch, and it seems this causes quite a few tests to break. One of the reasons is an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42703] fo:retrieve-marker misses fo: inline space character on first retrieve in page.

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42703 Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #19 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 12:48:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #18) Just ran the layoutengine test-suite after having applied the patch, and it seems this causes quite a few tests to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #21907|0 |1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #21 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 13:49:08 PST --- Further investigation into the ordering of footnotes for table-header and table-footer revealed that they are added to the first/last page in case

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #22 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 13:57:33 PST --- (In reply to comment #21) The problem with getLengthBase() seems to point to a difficulty with property-inheritance: strictly speaking, the