On 24.11.2008 16:50:48 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Hi Clay,
Yes with the refactoring and code reuse changes in the Temp_AFPGOCAResource
branch, other renderers
can now also take advantage of creating specialized concrete implementations
of
AbstractImageHandlerRegistry and ImageHandler.
On 24.11.2008 16:11:00 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Hi Chris (and all),
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Adrian,
you've put a lot of work into the GOCA branch and it has some great
features, but
There's one thing I don't like, which Jeremias points out in this thread:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42600
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 01:22:00 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22930)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22930)
Patch proposal
Tested with latest trunk version
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42600
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 01:23:24 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22931)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22931)
Example fo for testing
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42374
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 02:12:36 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22932)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22932)
Patch proposal
Changed several things, also in RtfListItem.java.
The
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42374
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 02:14:22 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22934)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22934)
Another small test fo
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42374
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 02:13:48 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22933)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22933)
Result of the posted fo
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42374
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25.11.2008 09:28:18 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 24.11.2008 16:11:00 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Hi Chris (and all),
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Adrian,
you've put a lot of work into the GOCA branch and it has some great
features, but
There's one thing I don't like, which
Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Jeremias,
Adrian,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm sure if such a person existed and they wrote their own FOP
plug-in they could very easily fix a very small compatibility issue
such as this.
Again: it's not the fix that is the problem. It is about
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm sure if such a person existed and they wrote their own FOP plug-in they could very easily fix a
very small compatibility issue such as this.
Again: it's not the fix that is the problem. It is about
backwards-compatibility and that's an issue mostly for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42374
Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
We currently use the PDF plugin in our software and I prefer not to
upgrade the plugin without knowing what the justification the interface
change is?
Providing support for native image embedding in AFP involves providing the image data (in whatever
form it
On 25.11.2008 13:27:19 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
We currently use the PDF plugin in our software and I prefer not to
upgrade the plugin without knowing what the justification the interface
change is?
Providing support for native image embedding in AFP
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43474
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43474
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 05:04:01 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22938)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22938)
Patch proposal
I created a patch working with the latest trunk
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43474
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 05:05:00 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22939)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22939)
Another test fo
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43474
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 05:05:53 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22940)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22940)
Result for the last fo
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42374
--- Comment #5 from Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 05:21:19 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=22941)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22941)
RTF after patch applied
Are you sure that the patch is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43474
Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrap-option=wrap doesn't |[PATCH]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42374
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 05:40:07 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22942)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22942)
Fo file
Sorry for the guideline mistakes.
To be generated correctly i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292
Summary: [PATCH] PS Renderer does not handle a string value for a
key in a dictionary.
Product: Fop
Version: all
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294
Summary: start-indent on list-item is not correctly handled
Product: Fop
Version: 0.95
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42374
--- Comment #7 from Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 09:04:24 PST
---
Thanks for sending the FO. I thought I'd corrected the whitespace but I guess I
must have missed something.
The first test file then Renders as
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294
--- Comment #1 from Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 09:10:54 PST
---
Just spotted a typo in the bug description. The bug I was testing when I found
the bug is actually bug 42374 not 42437
--
Configure bugmail:
On Nov 24, 2008, at 15:08, Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
I would like to call for a merge of the AFP branch [1] back into
trunk.
snip /
If the issue as discussed in the parallel thread is ironed out, I see
no reason why not.
+1 in that case.
Adrian, just a small FWIW: Chris has drawn the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43474
--- Comment #14 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25
10:56:12 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I created a patch working with the latest trunk version. It's similar to the
last patch. But there were some further
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292
Adrian Cumiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Hi,
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
snip /
OTOH, I feel compelled to mention that attempting to kill a raised,
perfectly legitimate issue in an unreasonable way (by taking it to be
a personal offense), may alienate some people...
That said, I would myself probably take it as a personal offence too
Hi Andreas,
2008/11/25 Andreas Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adrian, just a small FWIW: Chris has drawn the right conclusion, I think.
No need to take any of the questions/remarks personal (even though I
understand this is difficult after the time you've spent on perfecting the
code in that
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45097
--- Comment #14 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25
13:12:37 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Sorry to chime in so late...
Based on my novice analysis, it appears the various KnuthElements provide the
following
33 matches
Mail list logo
