[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 --- Comment #5 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com --- So I've been playing around with this this morning and with the junit-4.11 snapshot, it seems like all we need to do is change the @Parameters to @Parameters(name = Test file = {0}).

[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 --- Comment #6 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com --- Ohh and I did some perusing and my sleuthing skills suggest we shouldn't have to wait to long for the 4.11 release. Looking at the 4.x release dates, they seem to be releasing

[Bug 53573] New: Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 53573 Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Summary: Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL) Severity: normal

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All ---

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 nick.heywo...@altova.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 --- Comment #5 from nick.heywo...@altova.com --- Created attachment 29083 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29083action=edit The resulting PDF document -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO ---

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 --- Comment #7 from nick.heywo...@altova.com --- - java -version gives java version 1.6.0_31 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_31-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.6-b01, mixed mode) - Calling fop.bat with -d

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 --- Comment #8 from nick.heywo...@altova.com --- Created attachment 29084 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29084action=edit Output from fop.bat -d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 --- Comment #2 from na...@th.ibm.com --- Thanks for the promptly reply. Yes, i have tested with FOP 1.0 and it product exactly the same as the first line of the picture i attached. There are few Thai fonts that aren't using GSUB and GPOS.

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 nick.heywo...@altova.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW -- You are

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ---

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 nick.heywo...@altova.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #10

[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ---

[Bug 53577] New: explicit language may prevent gsub/gpos application

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53577 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 53577 Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Summary: explicit language may prevent gsub/gpos application Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

[Bug 53578] New: explicit script may prevent gsub/gpos application

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 53578 Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Summary: explicit script may prevent gsub/gpos application Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

[Bug 53577] explicit language may prevent gsub/gpos application

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53577 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53573 -- You are

[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||53577, 53578 --

[Bug 53578] explicit script may prevent gsub/gpos application

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53573 -- You are

[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 --- Comment #4 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org --- Created attachment 29090 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29090action=edit test FO file showing gsub/gpos application This FO shows the same data with Angsana

[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 --- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org --- Created attachment 29091 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29091action=edit test PDF file showing gsub/gpos application This file shows the output using

merge from ^/branches/fop-1_1 to ^/trunk

I have completed a reintegration merge from fop-1_1 into trunk followed by a record-only merge on fop-1_1 to allow it to incur future reintegration. Let me know if you notice anything amiss.