Hi Jeremias - I set you an email. Let me know if you received it. thx
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
> Not really. Please do "ant clean package >out.txt" and send me the
> "out.txt" file (off-list).
>
> On 09.07.2008 16:45:48 bonekrusher wrote:
>>
>> I spoke to soon. I am getting the same error
On Jul 9, 2008, at 11:06, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 09.07.2008 10:45:35 Max Berger wrote:
My favorite solution would be: Provide the new semantics with a new
signature (or method name), and keep the old one as "deprecated"
for at
least 1 release (Then all plugin developers have enough time to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45369
Summary: Footnotes Rendered at Top of Page when Using the
Intermediate Format
Product: Fop
Version: all
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Se
On Jul 9, 2008, at 09:39, Peter B. West wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Am I the only one concerned about backwards-compatibility here?
It's not my *concern*, but deliberately breaking compatibility does
seem pretty silly.
Yeah, so one night I thought: "Let's see if we can annoy everyone
On Jul 9, 2008, at 09:26, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Am I the only one concerned about backwards-compatibility here?
Not really. There's always Microsoft... :-)
Seriously, if I had made the change in 0.95, I would completely agree
(and would probably already have reverted the change).
Since it'
Not really. Please do "ant clean package >out.txt" and send me the
"out.txt" file (off-list).
On 09.07.2008 16:45:48 bonekrusher wrote:
>
> I spoke to soon. I am getting the same error after the clean.
>
> I am using Java 1.6
>
> Any ideas?
>
> thx
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> >
> > Yes
I spoke to soon. I am getting the same error after the clean.
I am using Java 1.6
Any ideas?
thx
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
> Yes. Works fine for me, BTW. An "ant clean" prior to the build can work
> wonders sometimes. Also, make sure you're using a Sun JVM to avoid any
> unexpected side-eff
Jeremias - thanks, that did the trick.
Now I am on to see if I can fix the table-continued implementation. Wish me
luck :)
Regards,
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
> Yes. Works fine for me, BTW. An "ant clean" prior to the build can work
> wonders sometimes. Also, make sure you're using a Sun JVM
Looks like your generated file URL has been somehow escaped incorrectly, not
sure that would work
"file:\C:\fop_trunk\trunk\build\gensrc\org\apache\fop\events\event-model.xml"
Which version of Java are you using and on which Windows platform?
Adrian.
bonekrusher wrote:
I downloaded the l
Yes. Works fine for me, BTW. An "ant clean" prior to the build can work
wonders sometimes. Also, make sure you're using a Sun JVM to avoid any
unexpected side-effects.
On 09.07.2008 16:15:54 bonekrusher wrote:
>
> I downloaded the latest Trunk this morning, which should be the latest.
> Correct?
I downloaded the latest Trunk this morning, which should be the latest.
Correct?
Peter B. West wrote:
>
> bonekrusher wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to build the FOP trunk (checked out with svn) with Ant and
>> get
>> the following error:
>>
>> va:231: warning: [deprecation] toURL() in java.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39980
Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
bonekrusher wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build the FOP trunk (checked out with svn) with Ant and get
the following error:
va:231: warning: [deprecation] toURL() in java.io.File has been deprecated
[javac] urls.add(libFiles[i].toURL());
[javac]
Hi,
I am trying to build the FOP trunk (checked out with svn) with Ant and get
the following error:
va:231: warning: [deprecation] toURL() in java.io.File has been deprecated
[javac] urls.add(libFiles[i].toURL());
[javac] ^
[javac]
I am out of the office until 07/11/2008.
Please work with John Oustalett and Phil Hardy for Insight for SAP issues
in my absense. I will respond to TPC Reporter issues when I return. If
you have any questions, please contact my manager Jim Dilley.
Thanks very much,
Brad
Note: This is a
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I just noticed that Ohloh finally shows FOP's full code history. The
project cost now also shows a somewhat more realistic value.
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/fop/analyses/latest
Jeremias Maerki
Measuring this stuff is a very tricky business.
On trunk alone, followi
Sounds like a fine approach, +1 from me.
Adrian.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 09.07.2008 10:45:35 Max Berger wrote:
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
Am I the only one concerned about backwards-compatibility here?
No. I am also concerned about backwards-compatibility, but in a
different way:
On 09.07.2008 10:45:35 Max Berger wrote:
> Jeremias,
>
> Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> > Am I the only one concerned about backwards-compatibility here?
>
> No. I am also concerned about backwards-compatibility, but in a
> different way:
>
> This change changed the semantics without changing the AP
I just noticed that Ohloh finally shows FOP's full code history. The
project cost now also shows a somewhat more realistic value.
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/fop/analyses/latest
Jeremias Maerki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Am I the only one concerned about backwards-compatibility here?
No. I am also concerned about backwards-compatibility, but in a
different way:
This change changed the semantics without changing the API, therefore
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Am I the only one concerned about backwards-compatibility here?
It's not my *concern*, but deliberately breaking compatibility does seem
pretty silly.
On 07.07.2008 18:52:55 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2008, at 18:09, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>
> > On Jul 7, 2008, at 15:22, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >
> >> I know I'm late on this one but I've only just stumbled over it while
> >> playing with the AFP renderer in the GOCA branch. This chang
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45366
Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |enhancement
23 matches
Mail list logo
