Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
I've written a short report on the performance of the new Intermediate
Format. The numbers show that the goals have been met. It's also
interesting to look at from a general perspective. I'm sure there could
be a lot more that I could have written and shown
On 12.02.2009 13:35:57 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
And that goes on...
Author: jeremias
Date: Wed Feb 11 14:54:26 2009
New Revision: 743351
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=743351view=rev
Log:
Added missing default font setup.
+/** {...@inheritdoc} */
+public
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #3 from Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com 2009-02-16
02:52:44 PST ---
Hi Jost,
I've just been trying out your patch. I applied the patch to a fresh check out
of the new IF branch, compiled it okay. But when I
So here's what I would propose to do with this patch:
Statistics:
- 7 new classes
- 2 new other files (XSLT stylesheets)
- 88 modified files
While this is totally new functionality it doesn't represent a full new
subsystem and the 9 new files, while essential, are making up the
smaller part of
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #4 from Jeremias Maerki jerem...@apache.org 2009-02-16 05:54:06
PST ---
Generally, the patch looks pretty good to me, besides the NPE which I know Jost
is already working on a fix for. That particular bug occurs because
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
I've written a short report on the performance of the new Intermediate
Format. The numbers show that the goals have been met. It's also
interesting to look at from a general perspective. I'm sure there could
be a lot more that I could have written and shown
On 16.02.2009 15:56:33 Max Berger wrote:
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
I've written a short report on the performance of the new Intermediate
Format. The numbers show that the goals have been met. It's also
interesting to look at from a general perspective. I'm sure there could
be
As mentioned earlier, I would like to start a vote for merging the
Intermediate Format branch [1] (revision 744946) into Trunk.
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AreaTreeNewDesign
+1 from me.
Jeremias Maerki
Follow-up issues for after the merge where I'd be glad for feedback:
- The new implementations currently all use a MIME suffix ;mode=painter.
They are now sufficiently tested that I'm confident that we can switch
over to them by default. One idea would be to put a switch in
RendererFactory so we
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.02.2009 13:35:57 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
And that goes on...
Author: jeremias
Date: Wed Feb 11 14:54:26 2009
New Revision: 743351
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=743351view=rev
Log:
Added missing default font setup.
+/**
And the attached patch _
Index: src/java/org/apache/fop/render/intermediate/AbstractBinaryWritingIFDocumentHandler.java
===
--- src/java/org/apache/fop/render/intermediate/AbstractBinaryWritingIFDocumentHandler.java (revision 744954)
Hi
Please understand I'm not a main java developer but I have taken the
responsibility of fop in our workplace as I usually write the xsltfo.
I am trying to implement flow maps inside and have so far found no
problems with adding the xml to the tree but that's where I get stuck.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #5 from Jost Klopfstein jost.klopfst...@gmail.com 2009-02-16
12:44:31 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23261)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23261)
Fixed NPE when used from command line
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #6 from Jost Klopfstein jost.klopfst...@gmail.com 2009-02-16
13:06:21 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23262)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23262)
Removed unused code in area/inline/Image
On 16.02.2009 17:11, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
As mentioned earlier, I would like to start a vote for merging the
Intermediate Format branch [1] (revision 744946) into Trunk.
+1 from me too, looks good.
J.Pietschmann
Hi Barry,
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by adding the xml to the tree.
Does that mean you managed to get the FO tree objects built from the
corresponding FO elements? The stuff in ElementMapping, the necessary FO
tree classes, the makers? How far did you really get?
Anyway, I
Hi Vincent
On 16.02.2009 18:29:41 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.02.2009 13:35:57 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
And that goes on...
Author: jeremias
Date: Wed Feb 11 14:54:26 2009
New Revision: 743351
URL:
17 matches
Mail list logo